Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
homegov.je

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government and parish services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Health Minister responds to Hospital Policy Development Board Report

DepartmentHealth and Social Services
AuthorMinister for Health and Community Services
Issue date29 Nov 2018
StatusPublished
Cost Prepared internally, no external cost

The Minister for Health and Community Services has published a response to the Hospital Policy Development Board report.

This report seeks to address the points raised by the Report of the Hospital Development Policy Board that was published on 14 November 2018.

The Hospital Policy Development Board was asked to review the evidence for the decision to build the Future Hospital on the current site, and the Chairman of the Board, Assistant Chief Minister, Connétable Christopher Taylor, presented its report to the Chief Minister earlier this month.


Deputy Richard Renouf disagreed with several of the Hospital Policy Development Board findings, because he said that they were not based on evidence. This report seeks to address those concerns

This report seeks to address those concerns, which summed up are:

  • delay in identifying and agreeing a different site, and then building a new hospital, is estimated to be ten years. This is in contrast to a plan which is ready to go and could deliver a new hospital for Islanders in phases with new outpatient facilities ready in 2022, and all clinical facilities completed in 2025
  • The Minister has grave concerns about the risks of running the present hospital for an extended time. These include increasing risks to patient safety (due to infection and disease control and overcrowding), the affordability, funding and maintenance of the existing buildings, which are decaying and not fit for purpose
  • no compelling evidence was identified to show that the States Assembly made a wrong decision about the approved site. No other site emerges as a clear alternative, because all have downsides
  • the approved site was properly evaluated and sufficient and accurate information was provided to politicians to make decisions
  • The Minister acknowledged the challenges of building beside an existing hospital but noted the Hospital Policy Development Board’s conclusion that that the current site could deliver an acute general hospital facility. The Minister and all Board members came to a good understanding of the that mitigation measures that the specialist hospital contractors would put in place and also acknowledged that any risk to patients and staff can be safely managed

Hospital Policy Development Board Report


Back to top
rating button