Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Le Ruisseau, Gorey Village Main Road, Grouville: Appeal Decision P/2020/1654

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 21 September 2021

Decision Reference:  MD-PE-2021-0059

Application Reference: P/2020/1654

Decision Summary Title:

Appeal Decision - Le Ruisseau, Gorey Village Main Road, Grouville

Date of Decision Summary:

 

07 September 2021

Decision Summary Author:

Principal Policy Planner – Strategic Policy, Planning and Performance

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

n/a

Written Report

Title :

Inspector’s Report- - Le Ruisseau, Gorey Village

Date of Written Report:

23 August 2021

 

Written Report Author:

Philip Staddon -Planning Inspector

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject: Appeal under Article 108 of the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002 against a decision to grant planning permission, P/2020/1654, for “Construct single storey office/store to South of site” at - Le Ruisseau, Gorey Village Main Road, Grouville.

Decision:

A. The Minister dismissed the appeal and varied the decision to grant planning permission which is now subject to the following conditions:

 

1. The development shall commence within three years of the decision date.

 

Reason: The development to which this permission relates will need to be reconsidered in light of any material change in circumstance. 

 

2.  The development hereby approved shall be carried out entirely in accordance with the plans, drawings, written details and documents which form part of this permission.

 

Reason: To ensure that the development is carried out and completed in accordance with the details approved.

 

3. The development hereby approved shall only be used for purposes ancillary to the main dwelling “Le Ruisseau” and, in particular, the accommodation is not approved for use as a separate residential unit.

 

Reason: To avoid the establishment of a separate residential unit which would not be in accordance with policies GD1 and H6 of the Adopted Island Plan 2011 (Revised 2014).

 

4. No part of the development hereby permitted shall be begun until a scheme of landscaping has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Department of the Environment. The scheme of landscaping shall provide details of the following; i)  all existing trees, hedgerows and other plants, walls, fences and other features which it is proposed to retain on the site; ii)  the position of all new trees and/or shrubs, this must include the species of plant(s)/tree(s) to be planted, their size, number and spacing and the means to be used to support and protect them; iii)  other landscape treatments to be carried out including any excavation works, surfacing treatments, or means of enclosure; iv)  the measures to be taken to protect existing trees and shrubs; v) the presence of any invasive plant species on site, and if present, a detailed method statement for the removal and long-term management/ eradication of the species; and, vi)  A landscape management plan for the maintenance of the landscaped areas. Once agreed, the approved scheme shall be implemented in full and thereafter retained as such.

 

Reason: To safeguard the character and appearance of the area in accordance with Policies GD1, NE1, NE2 and NE4 of the Adopted Island Plan 2011 (Revised 2014).

 

 

B. The Minister further resolved that the date of this decision constitutes a revision to the date of the planning permission for the purposes of establishing a start-date for any time-related conditions or requirements of the permission or of the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002.

 

C. The Minister also confirmed that submitted drawing numbers 21/1063/01 and M06/115 are approved and constitute part of the planning permission.

 

Reason for Decision:

The Minister agreed with the recommendations of the Inspector.

The Minister also considered it reasonable to revise the date of the original planning permission in order to take into account the time elapsed between the grant of the original planning permission and the determination of this appeal.

Resource Implications:

None.

Action required:

Request the Judicial Greffe to inform interested parties of the decision.

Signature:

 

 

 

Deputy John H Young

Position:

 

 

 

Minister for the Environment

Date Signed:

 

 

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

Back to top
rating button