Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Manpower Report for December 2005

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

Decisions were made on(27 March 2006) to approve and submit the December 2005 Manpower Report to the States; to approve the extension of twelve additional contract posts to 30 September 2006; to inform the Home Affairs Department that the additional 1.5 fte and 2 headcount posts required at the prison must be accommodated from elsewehere within the Home Affairs Department  

Subject:

Manpower Report December 2005

Decision Reference:

 

Exempt clause(s):

n/a

Type of Report: (oral or written)

Written

Person Giving Report (if oral):

n/a

Telephone or

e-mail Meeting?

n/a

Report

File ref:

JS/1/27/3/06

Written Report –

Title

December 2005 Manpower Report

Written report - author

Jane Strecker

Decision(s):

To approve and submit the attached manpower report for presentation to the States.

To approve the extension of twelve additional contract posts to the 30th September 2006.

To inform the Home Affairs Department that the additional 1.5 f.t.e and 2 headcount posts required at the Prison must be accommodated from within existing vacancies elsewhere within the Home Affairs department.

Reason(s) for decision

The manpower report is required to be lodged with the States on a six monthly basis.

The extension of the 12 contract posts will give sufficient opportunity for the Social Security Department to review the business model and establish an appropriate baseline manpower requirement.

The Home Affairs Department has not sought approval or provided justification for any additional posts.

Action required:

Notify Greffe to lodge manpower report with the States.

Inform the Social Security Department and Home Affairs Department of manpower implications.

Signature:

(Minister/ Assistant Minister)

Date of Decision:

27/03/06

 

 

 

 

 

Back to top
rating button