Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Data Protection Authority (Jersey) Law 201-: Lodging

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 30 November 2017:

Decision Reference: MD-C-2017-0147

Decision Summary Title: :

Data Protection Authority (Jersey) Law 201-

Date of Decision Summary:

30th November 2017

Decision Summary Author:

Director of Digital and Telecoms Policy

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title: :

Data Protection Authority (Jersey) Law 201-

Date of Written Report:

30th November 2017

Written Report Author:

Director of Digital and Telecoms Policy

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject:  Data Protection Authority (Jersey) Law 201-

Decision(s):  The Assistant Chief Minister, acting in accordance with indications of the Council of Ministers, and as the responsible Minister, approved the draft Data Protection Authority (Jersey) Law 201- and accompanying Report and asked that they be lodged au Greffe for debate by the States Assembly on 16th January 2018. The Assistant Chief Minister also signed the Statement of Compatibility confirming that the provisions of the Law were compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.

Reason(s) for Decision:  The current data protection regime in Jersey received an ‘adequacy’ decision from the EU Commission in 2008, meaning that the Data Protection (Jersey) Law 2005 is judged to provide an essentially equivalent level of protection as the European Union’s (‘EU’), and that data may therefore flow freely to and from the Island and EU member states.

 

The Government of Jersey has committed to renewing the ‘adequacy’ decision under a new European data protection regime. It has undertaken to meet the requirements of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (‘the GDPR’) and EU Law Enforcement Directive on the protection of personal information processed for the purposes of policing and public protection (the ‘Directive’).

 

Following extensive consultation, the draft Data Protection Authority (Jersey) Law 201- is proposed. The draft Data Protection Authority (Jersey) Law 201- will create a new data protection authority that will be fit for purpose to regulate the new data protection regime. (In parallel, the draft Data Protection (Jersey) Law 201- has been lodged to ensure continued adequacy. It bolsters the rights of the individual in relation to their personal data in the same areas as the GDPR and the Directive).

 

This Ministerial Decision and accompanying report relates to the draft Data Protection Authority (Jersey) Law 201-.

Resource Implications:  

 

There are resource implications for the draft Data Protection Authority (Jersey) Law 201-

The new Data Protection Authority (the ‘Authority’), constituted under the Data Protection Authority (Jersey) Law 201-, will have an expanded role to properly regulate the Data Protection (Jersey) Law 201-.

 

The Authority will be required to adopt a more proactive approach and to employ a wider and more robust range of regulatory powers and sanctions, with less emphasis placed on the role of courts to resolve disputes.  This will place a considerably greater burden on the Authority and it is essential to provide it with additional resources commensurate with that burden, to allow it to carry out its new duties.

 

A revenue model has been proposed that will both meet the requirements of the new legislation in respect of industry registration fees and provide increased revenue that will help enable the office to implement and enforce that legislation, and its increased function.

There will be a transitional period to the end of the MTFP during which time the Authority will roll out the operating and fees model and begin to levy increased revenue. Additional funding is required to support these implementation costs and to meet the Authority’s increased running costs during the transitional period.  

The annual cost of the current Office of the Information Commissioner will increase by an estimated £1.1 million to £1.65 million per annum. There will also be a need for an additional £350,000 to support one-off implementation work.

 

From 2020 the longer term costs will be offset by increased revenues from business which will allow the funding to return to close to current levels.

 

These are high levels maximum estimates and work will continue to be done in advance of the debate to create more accurate and cost effective costings.

Action required: To ask the Greffier of the States to lodge the draft Law and Report ‘au Greffe’ for debate by the States Assembly on 16th January 2018.

Signature: Senator P.F. Routier M.B.E.

 

 

 

Position: Assistant Chief Minister

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision:

Back to top
rating button