Medical Practitioners (Registration) (Amendment No.4)(Jersey) law 201-
Report
The current Medical Practitioners (Registration)(Jersey) Law 1960 is out of date and unfit for purpose:
The Royal Court registers medical practitioners at the point of entry to practise in Jersey, and there is no mechanism for the Register to be kept up to date.
The Minister of Health and Social Services has no role in this.
The current law refers only to registration of doctors and not to the new requirement (of the General Medical Council) that all practising doctors hold, and regularly revalidate licences to practise.
There are no local powers to investigate the fitness to practise of doctors in Jersey. There have been instances here in recent years where concerns about local doctors eventually triggered GMC national- level fitness to practise proceedings. Doctors had continued practising in Jersey whilst recognised problems escalated.
The amended law, as proposed, creates powers to remedy all of the above. It creates the basis for a system of local regulation of doctors, one of the commitments made in Proposition 36/2010 - unanimously adopted by this Assembly.
The General Medical Council has affirmed that, with the changes as proposed, it will accept that Jersey doctors are working in a system with equivalent local regulation as is usual throughout the United Kingdom, and accept recommendations from Jersey’s statutorily appointed Responsible Officer(s).
This newly amended law will create:
A live Register of doctors, administered by the Minister of Health and Social Services and publicly available.
New protection for patients in Jersey from poorly performing doctors, and the means of supporting doctors in difficulty by detecting problems early and enabling remediation.
A system that will enable doctors in Jersey to keep and regularly revalidate their GMC Licences to Practises – essential for maintaining medical manpower into the future, and Jersey’s standing as a jurisdiction with local regulation and standards at least as good as those elsewhere in the British Isles.
Financial Implications:
This amendment has no direct financial implications although subordinate legislation may well have some resource implications which will be detailed at the time.
Dr Susan Turnbull
Acting Medical Officer of Health
6 June 2011