Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Utilisation of Compromise Agreements

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 27 February 2012:

Decision Reference:  MD-C-2012-0027

Decision Summary Title :

Utilisation of Compromise Agreements

Date of Decision Summary:

27 February 2012

Decision Summary Author:

 

Director of Human Resources

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

 

Report – Public

Guidance – Exempt (3.2.1(a)(xiv)

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Utilisation of Compromise Agreements

Date of Written Report:

24 February 2012

Written Report Author:

Director of Human Resources

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Report – Public

Guidance – Exempt (3.2.1(a)(xiv)

Subject: Utilisation of Compromise Agreements

Decision(s):  The Chief Minister agreed on behalf of the SEB to present to the States the attached report on utilisation of compromise agreements and to disclose the previous Chief Executive’s severance payment.

Reason(s) for Decision:  In response to concerns raised by States Members and the wider public, the States Employment Board has drafted a new guidance framework policy and guidelines concerning the use of compromise agreements.

Resource Implications:  There are no resource implications

Action required:  The Greffier is requested to present report to the States at the earliest opportunity.

Signature:

 

 

Position:

 

Senator I J Gorst, Chief Minister

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

Back to top
rating button