Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Mental Health (Jersey) Law 2016: Approved Establishments

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 13 September 2019

Decision Reference MD-HSS-2019-0041

 

Decision Summary Title :

Notification of approved Establishments as required by Article 5(1) of the Mental Health (Jersey) Law 2016

 

Date of Decision Summary:

12 September 2019

Decision Summary Author:

 

Mental Health Law Administrator

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

 

Written Report

Title :

Notification of approved Establishments as required by Article 5(1) of the Mental Health (Jersey) Law 2016

 

Date of Written Report:

12 September 2019

Written Report Author:

Lead Social Worker, Mental Health

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject: Notification of Approved Establishments as required by Article 5(1) and (2) of the Mental Health (Jersey) Law 2016.

 

Decision(s):  The Minister, having been briefed by his Officers of the requirements of Approved Establishments, has identified ‘Brockfield House’ as an Approved Establishment for the purposes of admission or detention under Parts 8 and 9 of the Mental Health (Jersey) Law 2016 only.

 

Reason(s) for Decision: The Minister has a duty under article 5(1) and (2) of the Mental Health (Jersey) Law 2016 which states:

 

‘(1) The Minister must approve establishments or premises for the purpose of the care and treatment of patients, upon such terms and conditions as (subject to paragraph (2)) the Minister may think fit.

 

(2) The Minister may not exercise the function conferred by paragraph (1) unless the Minister is satisfied that, having regard to the best available treatment, the standard of treatment provided by the establishment or premises in question is appropriate and adequate’.

 

In terms of economy of scale there has not been, and still remains, no capacity to staff an Approved Establishment of this nature to serve the needs of individuals requiring specialist treatment in Jersey. Governance and due diligence checks have been completed and Brockfield House has been identified as appropriate and adequate to fulfil that requirement.

 

Resource Implications: There are no resource implications

 

Action required: The Minister to sign this Ministerial Decision so that Brockfield House, Essex becomes an approved establishment for the purposes of admission or detention of Jersey patients.

 

Signature:

 

 

Position:

Assistant Minister for Health and Social Services

 

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

Back to top
rating button