Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Jersey Financial Services Commission: Cash Holding Guidelines

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 28 September 2018

MINISTERIAL DECISION REFERENCE  

MD-C-2018-0153

DECISION SUMMARY TITLE  

Jersey Financial Services Commission Cash Holding Guidelines

DECISION SUMMARY AUTHOR

Lead Policy Adviser, Banking & Corporate

IS THE DECISION SUMMARY PUBLIC OR EXEMPT? 

Public

REPORT TITLE  

Jersey Financial Services Commission Cash Holding Guidelines

REPORT AUTHOR OR NAME OF PERSON GIVING REPORT

Lead Policy Adviser, Banking & Corporate

IS THE REPORT PUBLIC OR EXEMPT?

Public

DECISION AND REASON FOR THE DECISION

Article 18 of the Financial Services Commission (Jersey) Law 1998 provides that, “The Commission may invest any of its funds which are not immediately required in accordance with guidelines set by the Minister.”

 

The Minister therefore approved Guidelines as outlined in the attached Report, replacing any existing Guidelines as at the date of this Ministerial Decision.

 

RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS

There are no resource implications.

ACTION REQUIRED

The Lead Policy Adviser, Banking & Corporate to arrange for the Guidelines to be issued to the Jersey Financial Services Commission.

 

 

 

 

SIGNATURE

 

SENATOR JOHN LE FONDRE

CHIEF MINISTER OF JERSEY

 

POSITION

 

 

EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY

DATE SIGNED

Jersey Financial Services Commission: Cash Holding Guidelines

 

REPORT

Jersey Financial Services Commission Cash Holding Guidelines

 

Background

 

Article 18 of the Financial Services Commission (Jersey) Law 1998 provides that, “The Commission may invest any of its funds which are not immediately required in accordance with guidelines set by the Minister.”

 

The Minister, recognising that the Jersey Financial Services Commission (JFSC):

 has statutory powers to levy fees and charges under various laws it administers in order to carry out its duties;

 is able to borrow money;

 is able to receive grants from the government;

 can levy penalties on regulated firms (prior to returning them to the industry more generally or the government); and

 collects certain fees on behalf of the government (i.e. company annual return fees),

notes that the JFSC is likely to maintain positive balances in its banking relationships (the size of such balances varying throughout the year).

 

The Minister therefore wishes to set the following Guidelines, replacing any existing Guidelines as at the date of this Report.

 

 

Guidelines

 

These Guidelines reflect the following principles:

 that the JFSC operates independently of the Government of Jersey under relevant laws (subject to the ability of the Minister to give the JFSC guidance or general directions in certain circumstances, as explained in the Memorandum of Understanding between the Minister and the JFSC);

 that the Minister can be assured that the JFSC carries out effective supervision of deposit-takers, at an entity and a sectoral level, and has the expertise to develop an effective treasury policy;

 that, ultimately, there may be circumstances where the Government has to ‘stand behind’ the JFSC financially (such circumstances are expected to be extremely unusual).

 

1.  The Minister authorises and requires the JFSC to develop a policy (Policy) for the investment of surplus funds.

 

2.  The Policy, and any amendments to it, must be approved by the JFSC’s Board of Commissioners.

 

3.  The Board of Commissioners must review the operation of the Policy on an annual basis.

 

4.  The Policy must adhere to the following principles:

 security of prevailing cash deposits and access to liquidity should be the over-riding concern;

 individual counterparty strength must be considered and robustly monitored;

 deposits will not be places with counterparties holding a Standard & Poors long-term issue credit rating of less than BBB (or equivalent from another credit rating agency);

 the JFSC shall also consider prevailing systemic and regulatory risks that might impair liquidity (including new powers that may be applied in bank recovery and resolution scenarios).

 

 

[End]

 

 

Page 1 of 2

Back to top
rating button