Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Budget Transfer: Central Planning Vote to Education Sport and Culture: Jersey Archive Extension: Feasibility Study

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 20 October 2015:

Decision Reference: MD-ESC-2015-0022

Decision Summary Title:

Central Planning Vote to Education, Sport and Culture to fund a feasibility study on the proposed extension to the Jersey Archive

Date of Decision Summary:

15th October 2015

Decision Summary Author:

Assistant Director, Policy and Strategy

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Oral

Person Giving

Oral Report:

Assistant Director, Policy and Strategy

Written Report Title:

 

Date of Written Report:

 

Written Report Author:

Assistant Director, Policy and Strategy

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject: 

Central Planning Vote (CPV) allocation to Education, Sport and Culture (ESC) to fund a feasibility study on the proposed extension to the Jersey Archive

Decision(s): 

The Minister for ESC requested that the Minister for Treasury and Resources approve a budget transfer of £60,000 in 2015 from the Central Planning Vote to ESC to fund a feasibility study on the proposed extension to the Jersey Archive.

Reason(s) for Decision:  

Funds are required to enable the feasibility study to proceed, and it is estimated the study will cost a maximum of £60,000.

 

The case for an extension to the Jersey Archive is based on the importance of the role which the Archive plays to the Public Records (Jersey) Law 2002 and the Freedom of Information (Jersey) Law 2011, and the serious shortage of storage space which threatens to compromise that role.  Space is currently forecast to run out entirely in 2019. Without intervention, there is a danger that the States will not be in a position to comply with its legal obligations.

 

Resource Implications:  

The Archive Extension is in the States forward capital programme for the year 2016, and is included in the Medium Term Financial Plan 2016-2019 that was approved by the States on 8th October 2015. The funding of £60,000 is needed in the short term to enable the feasibility study to commence. Following completion of the feasibility study, it is planned the project will go out to tender early in 2016.

 

The newly created Capital head of expenditure Jersey Heritage Trust - Archive Store Extension will be established for the project on behalf of ESC by Jersey Property Holdings, with the Central Planning Vote decreasing by an identical amount. This decision does not change the total amount of expenditure that would be approved by the States for the Archive Extension in the 2016 States Annual Budget, scheduled for consideration by the States in December 2016,, and following approval by the States of capital funding the amount received for the feasibility study will be transferred back to the CPV in the year in which capital funds are allocated. If, however, the States should decide not to approve the capital project in December 2015, then it would be the responsibility of ESC to repay the CPV from alternative sources of funding.

Action required:  

The Finance Director to seek approval from the Minister for Treasury and Resources and then to action the budget transfer.  

Signature:

Position: Deputy Rod Bryans

Minister for Education, Sport and Culture

Date Signed:  

 

Date of Decision:  

Budget Transfer: Central Planning Vote to Education Sport and Culture: Jersey Archive Extension: Feasibility Study

 

 

Education, Sport and Culture Department

Report

 

Subject:

Jersey Archive Extension: Feasibility Vote

 

Exempt Clause:

 

 

Date:

 

16th October  2015

 

 

Author:

Jeremy Harris, Assistant Director - Policy and Strategy

 

 

 

  1. Introduction

 

The purpose of this report is to request funding of £60,000 from the Treasury to allow a feasibility study to be undertaken on the extension to the Jersey Archive. The project has been proposed for commencement in 2016 as part of the forward capital programme, and is listed in the Medium Term Financial Plan 2016-2019 approved by the States on 8th October 2015.

 

  1. Background

 

The case for a new archive repository is based on the importance of the role which the Jersey Archive plays to the Public Records (Jersey) Law 2002 and the Freedom of Information (Jersey) Law 2011, and the serious shortage of storage space which threatens to compromise that role.  Space is currently forecast to run out entirely in 2019. Without intervention, there is a danger that the States will not be in a position to comply with its legal obligations.

 

Consequently, the DfESC has strongly supported the case for a new store and in 2014 established a project group, comprising representatives of the DfESC, Jersey Heritage and Jersey Property Holdings.  The group met on 29 August 2014, agreed the parameters of the project and the need to make a formal business case for the project to the Treasury.  (A copy is attached for information as Appendix A).

 

  1.    Next steps

 

The initial meeting of the project group confirmed that the Clarence Road site was capable of accommodating an extension of the size proposed (588 square metres, mirroring existing provision) but identified the need to undertake a feasibility study to explore how this storage capacity could best be provided on the site.  Following discussion with the Treasury, it was agreed that an application would be made if the project were ultimately included in the MTFP.

 

Jersey Property Holdings has advised that the sum of £60,000 would be required to carry out a feasibility study.

 

  1.    Recommendation

 

Since the project does appear in the MTFP, the Treasury is formally requested to release £60,000 from the Central Planning Vote, so that the feasibility work can be undertaken.

 


APPENDIX A

Business Case

Jersey Archive - Extension

 

  1. Overview of Capital Request

In 1992 the States voted to establish an archive service with suitable premises to house the archives (P.99/1992). The Jersey Archive in Clarence Road opened in 2000 following a grant of capital funding from the general reserve in 1996.

 

The Archive has operated successfully since 2000 but the adoption of the Public Records (Jersey) Law in 2002 and the additional demand which the Freedom of Information Law will create next year mean that storage space at the Archive will soon run out: the Archivist estimates that there will be no room to accommodate further records from 2019.

 

In spite of the impact of electronic record-keeping, it is not expected that paper records will cease to exist in the foreseeable future; consequently, there is a need to provide further storage space of an appropriate nature to hold valuable documents and to allow them to be accessed by the public upon request. Creation of an additional strong-room of the same size as the present one would provide more than 30 years’ future storage at current rates of deposit.

 

The DfESC included this project in the States Capital plan for 2017.  A bid for £3.5m has been approved and included in the 2016 capital plan; a project group has been established accordingly.  Funding for a feasibility study is now required to develop the scheme in greater detail and establish whether the current funding bid is realistic.

  1. States Strategic Plan Priorities and Department Business Plan Objectives

The Jersey Archive plays a key role in fulfilling the legal requirements of the Public Records and Freedom of Information Laws: it provides a service to receive, catalogue and store records, and to make them accessible to the public or for official purposes.  The Archive building combines a storage facility with an appropriate environment in which to consult records. 

 

Access to information is crucial to government and to public sector reform (objective 6 - States Strategic Plan 2012-2015), and it also informs sustainable long-term planning (objective 7).  However, it is vital for all aspects of government; there is a statutory requirement for government to manage its public records, maintain them in appropriate form and to allow public access on reasonable request. It should also be noted that the relationship between the States and the Archive means that individual States Departments do not have to pay for the storage and management of their own documents once they are transferred from those departments to the central repository.

 

Apart from its relevance to the reform agenda and to FoI legislation, the Archive makes an important contribution to Jersey’s cultural life.  It gives members of the public and historians access to materials about our shared past and this, in turn, leads to a range of positive outcomes including helping foster an understanding of our heritage, supporting educational projects and helping develop positive cultural links with other jurisdictions .   This is crucial to a third States’ objective: the promotion of family and community values (objective 4), and to the development of pride in the Island. These are also themes of the States’ Cultural Strategy adopted in 2005.

 

The proposed Archive Extension also supports the Council of Ministers draft ‘Strategic Priorities 2015-2018’, published in January 2015, which includes the following objective under ‘Education’ –

 

 Objective 2.1: Reshape the Island’s curriculum to ensure that all Jersey’s children and young people understand the Island’s history, geography and culture

 

  1. Options that have been considered (Economic Case)

The Jersey Archive is a specialist facility, built with funding from the States of Jersey to store records under appropriate physical conditions and to allow them to be consulted by the public. Provision was made in the original design of the Archive for several strong-rooms but ultimately for reasons of cost it was decided to proceed with a single storage block. 

 

There is now a need for additional storage to ensure that records remain accessible to the public on the same site. Since the site is owned by the States and it appears likely that it can accommodate expansion consistent with the original design, it is not regarded as practical to consider an alternative to enlarging the Clarence Road building.

 

  1. Management Case

The delivery of the scheme will be overseen by a project group comprising representatives of the Education, Sport and Culture Department, Jersey Property Holdings and Jersey Heritage which operates the Archive.  Subject to the availability of funds, a feasibility study will be carried out and this will yield a detailed timetable with project milestones.

  1. Financial Analysis – costs to main department and any other departments

The capital costs of the scheme will be available on completion of the feasibility study (estimated cost: £60,000).    Efforts will be made in the design to optimise energy-saving technology to minimise utility costs. It is not predicted by the Jersey Archive that the creation of additional storage will have a significant revenue implication on its operation. The main additional revenue cost will be heating, and this cost is not anticipated to be particularly significant, given the proposed use and design of the building. The building will be designed to minimise heat loss, and will not, for example, require lots of windows. It is proposed that the additional building’s heating requirements should be met by solar panels that will be installed as part of the capital project. Once installed, the running costs for the panels will be negligible.

The Archive is currently in discussion with the States over the need to consolidate existing temporary staff posts funded as part of measures to address the requirements of FoI legislation; however, there are no additional staff costs associated with the expanded storage.

The indicative capital cost is £3,500,000 and this figure will be validated as an outcome of the feasibility study, however the anticipated cash flow (assuming an 18 month contract period) would be as follows:  

 

Capital Costs

 

 

2014

2015

2016

2017+

 

Feasibility Vote

 

60,000

 

 

Planning Vote

 

300,000

 

 

Construction

 

 

2,000,000

 

Construction

 

 

 

1,060,000 

Retentions

 

 

 

80,000

 

  1. Commercial Case

It is envisaged that the feasibility work would be completed by the end of 2015 to permit building works to commence in 2016 for completion in 2017.

  1. Successful outcome

The success of the project itself is to be gauged from provision of space to allow the Jersey Archive to continue to receive and store public records thereby allowing it to comply with the requirements of FoI and Public Records legislation.

  1. Unit/Asset number of identified disposals

 

Not applicable.

  1. Impact of NOT progressing the Capital request

If funding is not available to increase storage at the Jersey Archive, it is predicted that capacity will be exhausted in five years’ time.  This means that after 2019 the Archive would not be able to accept further records even though it has a legal obligation to do so.  In practice, therefore, there would be a requirement to rent storage space for records elsewhere; this would also incur additional ongoing staff costs in accessing those records and would inevitably mean delays in making the information available.

  1. Related Projects

There are no related capital projects but it should be noted that additional revenue funding has been provided to the Jersey Archive to prepare for the implementation of the Freedom of Information Law to engage staff to help in the cataloguing or public records, reflecting the importance of the Archive’s work to compliance with the Law.  The present capital project provides additional physical space to store and care for those records and to allow them to be accessed.

 

  1. Other dependencies

The project is dependent on capital funding and on Planning permission for development on the Archive site.

  1. Identification of Key Risks

There is a risk that Planning permission may not be forthcoming; however, the feasibility study will take into account Planning policy as it affects this part of St Helier.

There is a risk of a project over-run but appropriate controls will be introduced by the project group

There is a risk that an increase in Archive before deposits will result in current capacity being reached earlier than 2019; however, data from the Archivist and Records Officers would allow mitigating measures to be taken. 

  1. Overall timescales and key milestone dates

Timescales and milestones are dependent upon the results of the feasibility study. The DfESC wishes to complete this in time for the forthcoming MTFP.

  1. Project Roles and Sign off (Suggested)

Title

Accountability

Signature and Date

Responsible Budget Holder

Accountable for delivery on time and on budget

 

 

Capital Projects Manager,

Jersey Property Holdings

 

Date ……………………..

Sponsoring Department

Accountable for delivery on time and on budget

 

 

 

Director of Estates,

Jersey Property Holdings

 

Date ……………………..

Finance Director (Department)

Sign to vouch that this project is the optimum value solution and will accord to all relevant Financial Directions and that the supporting detailed information has been prepared.

 

 

 

 

Finance Director,

ESC Department

 

Date ……………………..

Finance Director (Sponsor)

 

 

 

 

Finance Manager,

Jersey Property Holdings

 

Date ……………………..

Accounting Officer (Department)

Sign to confirm that this project is the optimum value solution and has been prioritised against existing services.

 

 

 

 

Director,

ESC Department

 

Date ……………………..

Key Stakeholders/End user sign off

Have end users been consulted to ensure their requirements/future planning have been met/considered?

 

 

 

 

Assistant Director, Policy and Strategy,

ESC Department

 

Date………………………

 

 

 

 

Page 1

 

 

 

 

Back to top
rating button