Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Income Support: Free GP Access (P101/2014): Ministerial Comment

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 27 June 2014:

Decision Reference: MD-S-2014-0081

Decision Summary Title :

DS - Comment on P.101 - Free GP Access

Date of Decision Summary:

26 June 2014

Decision Summary Author:

Policy Principal

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

WR - Comment on P.101 - Free GP Access

Date of Written Report:

26 June 2014

Written Report Author:

Policy Principal

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Subject: Minister’s comment on P.101 Income Support: Free GP Access

Decision(s): The Minister decided to present a comment to the States with regard to Deputy Southern’s proposition,  P.101/2014 Income Support: Free GP Access

Reason(s) for Decision:  Deputy Southern has lodged P.101/2014   Income Support: Free GP Access.     The proposition seeks introduce a new benefit to the income support scheme, where people who have a HMA will become entitled to free GP consultations, fully funded by the Health Insurance Fund.   The attached comment contains the Social Security Minister’s response to the proposition.

Resource Implications: None

Action required:  Policy Principal to request the Greffier of the States to arrange for the comment to be presented to the States as soon as practicable.

Signature:

 

 

Position:

Minister

 

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

Income Support: Free GP Access (P101/2014): Ministerial Comment

Comment P.101 Free GP Access

Members are strongly urged to reject the original proposition of Deputy Southern and support the amended proposition as proposed by Deputy Hérissier.

Household Medical Accounts (HMAs) are set up by the Department, in a voluntary arrangement, to assist people who have difficulty budgeting for GP costs but these accounts are not created according to a medical criteria; HMAs should not be confused with the benefits which are in place to help people with a clinical need.   Bearing this distinction in mind, the proposition is asking that a sub-set of Income Support claimants are awarded free GP access while others, who may have a similar or even greater need, are not considered.  Adopting this proposition would create an inequity in the income support scheme and run counter to the core principle, where the amount of benefit awarded is flexed according to household circumstances, including medical need.  

The standard Income Support weekly benefit includes an amount to pay for up to four GP visits each year.  The Income Support benefit also includes a clinical costs component which provides additional financial support for people who need to make more frequent visits to their GP.   This component pays an additional £163.80 to £327.60 per annum to depending on the magnitude of need, and is currently paid to over 2,000 households.

Further, people with health conditions and disabilities may also claim personal care components and mobility components.  The clinical care, personal care and mobility components are awarded following a medical assessment and therefore targeted to people who require this additional support.   Claimants may also apply for a special payment to assist with medical costs; during 2013 Special Payments for GP costs totalled £564,300.  

Support given via Special Payments and the medical components in Income Support is offered in addition to Medical and Pharmaceutical Benefit funded by the Health Insurance Fund.

The proposition suggests that the cost of giving a sample of Income Support claimants fully funded GP access is in the region of £360,000.  However the cost of such a scheme requires a far more detailed examination.   The Assembly is aware that the primary health care services are under review following P.82/2012 - Health and Social Services: A new way forward.    The Department is working with the Health and Social Services Department and Primary Care professionals to consider the future of primary care services.  Any change to payment or funding mechanisms requires detailed consideration in order to assess the impacts and unintended consequences on both patient and clinical behaviour. The primary care review will draw upon health economics and modelling expertise, in order to mitigate the risk of a new mechanism being introduced which adversely affects services, access or equity.    Any significant changes to medical benefits should be informed by this wider strategic review.

The proposition further suggests that the Health Insurance Fund can be used to pay for the new scheme.  The HIF is under mounting pressure as the Island’s population ages and costs associated with pharmaceutical and medical benefit increase.  The UK Government Actuary’s review of the Health Insurance Fund will be available next month and it would be unwise to make a commitment to offer free, unlimited services ahead of the Actuary’s advice.   In addition the Treasury and Resources Minister has confirmed that he will hold the Department to the previously announced savings in the Income Support budget of £3 million in 2014. This means that no funding is available from the Income Support Budget unless other areas of tax funded benefits are reduced.

Access to primary care for those on low incomes remains a matter of concern; however this issue is already highlighted in the Social Security Business Plan for 2014 and work is already planned to take place in the second half of the year. 

Project 16/2014

Investigate options to improve support for GP costs within low income groups, within existing budgets

The amendment lodged by Deputy Hérissier recognises that the delivery of primary health care is being reviewed and that broader questions need to be addressed regarding access to primary care, low income and high need.  An investigation, as suggested by the amendment, will offer valuable information to the wider primary care review.

The Proposition as presented does not receive my support as it is poorly targeted and would pre-empt the outcome of work already being undertaken.  I urge members to reject the proposition and support the amendment.

Standing Order 37A:   Presentation of comment relating to a proposition

This comment has been submitted outside the deadline set out in standing order 37A.  The comment is late because the deadline has been brought forward and it was not possible to finalise the comment before the earlier noon Thursday deadline.

Back to top
rating button