Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Government of Jersey: Customer Feedback Policy

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 16 September 2019

Decision Reference: MD-C-2019-0114

Decision Summary Title :

DS – GOJ Customer Feedback Policy

Date of Decision Summary:

6th September 2019

Decision Summary Author:

Project Manager

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

NA

Written Report

Title :

WR - GOJ Customer Feedback Policy

Date of Written Report:

6th September 2019

Written Report Author:

Project Manager

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject: Government of Jersey Customer Feedback Policy

Decision(s): The Chief Minister decided to approve the Government of Jersey Customer Feedback Policy.

Reason(s) for Decision:

Implementation of the new Customer Feedback Policy across the Government of Jersey, in place of the historic departmental processes, is part of the One Government modernisation programme, which puts customers at the heart of what we do and makes it easy for them to access government services.

 

The Policy sets out:

-          How all customers and members of the public (including children, young people and people who require additional assistance) are able to express their views about how our services are provided

-          Our commitment to dealing with all feedback in a consistent and timely manner

-          How customer information will be processed

 

Resource Implications: There are no financial or manpower implications.

Action required: All departments to implement the Government of Jersey Customer Feedback Policy.

 

 

Signature:

 

 

 

Position: Chief Minister

Date Signed

 

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

Government of Jersey: Customer Feedback Policy

Government of Jersey Customer Feedback Policy

Report

 

  1. Following direction from the Executive Management Team (EMT), Customer and Local Services (CLS) has set up a project to introduce a Government of Jersey (GOJ) customer feedback policy, and implement a standardised process for handing and responding to customer feedback across the organisation.
     
  2. The Chief Minister is being requested to endorse the policy, for implementation by all GOJ departments.  CLS will take on the central function of ensuring that consistent standards are adopted, and that customer feedback is used to improve service delivery across the organisation.  In order to do this CLS will process some information on behalf of other departments. Data Processing Agreements will be put in place to enable this to happen.

 

  1. As a learning organisation, we are committed to improving effectiveness and efficiency. We want to get it right the first time. Listening and responding to customer feedback will support us in this aim.

    Historically, department-specific processes have been implemented, however this has made it difficult to provide joined up responses, resolution and service improvements as a result.


As part of the One Government approach, we are modernising services and ensuring that customers at the heart of everything we do.  The Customer Feedback Policy sets out how all customers and members of the public (including children, young people and people that require additional assistance) are able to express their views about how our services are provided. 

 

  1. The implementation of this policy is related to the broader work being undertaken by the GoJ on administrative redress in response to the recommendations made within the Independent Jersey Care inquiry.  The inquiry specifically recommended that:
    ‘An effective complaints system is one key element in the structures that are necessary to ensure that looked after children are safe, and, to that end, we recommend that the current complaints system is replaced with one that is easily accessed and in which children and young people have confidence. The outcomes of complaints should be reported regularly to the relevant Minister, who, in turn, should present an annual report to the States.’ Independent Jersey Care Inquiry p. 57.

 

  1. It is also related to the recommendations made by the Jersey Law Commission in the following Topic Reports:
    Topic Report 2018 https://jerseylawcommission.files.wordpress.com/2018/11/jsylawcom_designingombudsman_final.pdf
    Topic Report 2017 https://jerseylawcommission.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/jsylawcom_topicreport_adminredress_final.pdf

 

  1. The 2017 report and subsequent response from the then Chief Minister refers more broadly to administrative redress and complaints processes.  Three recommendations have particular relevance to the Customer Feedback Project:
    Recommendation 2.1:     Create a legal duty on the Chief Minister to issue guidance to public bodies about fair and effective handling of complaints
    Recommendation 2.2:     Create a legal duty on the Chief Minister to present an annual report to the States Assembly on administrative justice across the Government of Jersey and other public bodies.
    Recommendation 2.3:     The States Assembly should scrutinise the Chief Minister’s annual report on administrative justice.

    Should these recommendations be adopted, the implementation of the Customer Feedback Policy by all departments will enable the Chief Minister to present such an annual report to the States Assembly.  Data for such a report will be collected in a consistent manner by all departments and reported regularly to the Executive Leadership Team.

 

  1. Upon the Chief Minister’s approval, CLS will work with other departments to roll out staff training, a new system for recording, monitoring and reporting on complaints, and communicate changes to stakeholders ahead of full implementation on 30 September 2019.

 

Financial and manpower implications

There are no staff or other resource implications to this proposal.

1

 

Back to top
rating button