Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:


    Update your notification preferences


    Access government services


    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Email correspondence concerning Rubis (FOI)

Email correspondence concerning Rubis (FOI)

Produced by the Freedom of Information office
Authored by States of Jersey and published on 24 April 2018.


Please can I receive all emails between Peter de Putron and Senator Ozouf containing the word Rubis between 2013 and 2016.


The e-mails attached have been reviewed and appropriate exemptions have been applied.

Email correspondence

Mr de Putron’s email address is considered to be his personal data and has been redacted in line with Article 25 of the Freedom of Information (Jersey) Law 2011. It is considered that to release this information would breach the first data protection principle. Furthermore, it is considered, in the absence of consent that on balance disclosure is not supported by paragraph 6 of Schedule 2, thus none of the legitimising conditions for processing have been met. The data subjects would not reasonably expect their personal data to be shared in this manner.

Exemptions and articles applied

Article 25 - Personal information

(1) Information is absolutely exempt information if it constitutes personal data of which the applicant is the data subject as defined in the Data Protection (Jersey) Law 2005.
(2) Information is absolutely exempt information if –

(a) it constitutes personal data of which the applicant is not the data subject as defined in the Data Protection (Jersey) Law 2005; and

(b) its supply to a member of the public would contravene any of the data protection principles, as defined in that Law.

Back to top
rating button