Proposed new skatepark (FOI)

​Request

I am interested in the proposed new skatepark. It is evident from the scrutiny meeting held on 11 December that the situation is not clear and some clarification would be appreciated.

The following is a link to a video of the Scrutiny meeting in question and the relevant part relating to the skatepark starts at 12 minutes 40 seconds into the video:

Scrutiny Panel 11 December 2020

Please could you provide me with the following information:

A

Any emails during January-December 2020 between Constable Mike Jackson and [name redacted] in Infrastructure containing the keywords "skatepark" and "skate park"

B

Any emails to or From Barclay Harvey during the period January-December 2020 containing the keywords "skatepark" and "skate park"

C

Any emails To or From Hugh Raymond during the period January-December 2020 containing the keywords "skatepark" and "skate park"

D

A copy of the document Deputy Hugh Raymond is reading from and refers to in the Scrutiny meeting held on 11th December 2020.

Response

A search of the Government of Jersey email system has been carried out using the parameters requested.

We confirm that no correspondence was identified from the searches carried out on the following parties

• Constable Mike Jackson

• [Name redacted]

• Hugh Raymond

However, we have attached copies of correspondence from Barclay Harvey’s account.

Emails 1

Emails 2

Emails 3

Emails 3 attachment

Emails 4

Emails 5

Deputy Hugh Raymond was reading from the attached Scrutiny Panel report dated 9 December 2020.

Scrutiny panel report 9 Dec 2020

Any personal data within these documents has been redacted in accordance with Article 25 of the Freedom of Information (Jersey) Law 2011 (the Law).

Article Applied

Article 25 Personal information

(1) Information is absolutely exempt information if it constitutes personal data of which the applicant is the data subject as defined in the Data Protection (Jersey) Law 2005.

(2) Information is absolutely exempt information if –

(a) it constitutes personal data of which the applicant is not the data subject as defined in the Data Protection (Jersey) Law 2018[7]; and

(b) its supply to a member of the public would contravene any of the data protection principles, as defined in that Law.[8]

(3) In determining for the purposes of this Article whether the lawfulness principle in Article 8(1)(a) of the Data Protection (Jersey) Law 2018[9] would be contravened by the disclosure of information, paragraph 5(1) of Schedule 2 to that Law (legitimate interests) is to be read as if sub-paragraph (b) (which disapplies the provision where the controller is a public authority) were omitted.[10]