First Point Lido Jersey

​​​Request ​776292538

Provide all correspondence, communications, emails (including attachments), forwarded messages, and email chains, whether sent or received, between 1 January 2024 to 31 October 2025, that relate to or reference:

• First Point / First Point Property Services / First Point Lido Jersey

• The Expression of Interest (EOI) / tender process for the Havre des Pas Bathing Pool site also referred to as The Lido

• Threats, alleged threats, or references to:

- Judicial Review

- Corruption

- Improper influence

- Legal action

- Pressure applied to officers, panel members, or elected officials

• Correspondence described as “unparliamentary” or inappropriate

• The apology issued by Constable Marcus Troy regarding language used in correspondence

• Matters referred to in the Jurats’ report concerning this process

Named parties (senders and/or recipients)

This request explicitly includes correspondence sent by, received by, copied to, or forwarded between any of the following parties, whether acting individually or on behalf of an organisation:

Organisations

• First Point

• First Point Property Services

• First Point Lido Jersey

• Jersey Property Holdings

Individuals

• Jason Maindonald

• Deborah Maindonald

• Constable Marcus Troy

• Constable Andy Jehan

• Constable Simon Crowcroft

• Tim Daniels

• Jersey Property Holdings

• Andy Scate

• Deputy Mary Le Hegarat

• Deputy Inna Gardiner

• Any member of the independent evaluation panel for the EOI process

Response

The Scheduled Public Authority (SPA)have carried out the relevant searches, however due to the volume of records and associated documents, it has been estimated that to provide the requested information would exceed the 12.5 hours allowed for Freedom of Information responses in accordance with Regulation 2 (1) of the Freedom of Information (Costs) (Jersey) Regulations 2014. 

A SPA that has been requested to supply information may refuse to supply the information if it estimates that the cost of doing so would exceed an amount determined in the manner prescribed by Regulations. 

Article applied

Article 16 - A scheduled public authority may refuse to supply information if cost excessive

(1) A scheduled public authority that has been requested to supply information may refuse to supply the information if it estimates that the cost of doing so would exceed an amount determined in the manner prescribed by Regulations.

(2) Despite paragraph (1), a scheduled public authority may still supply the information requested on payment to it of a fee determined by the authority in the manner prescribed by Regulations for the purposes of this Article.

(3) Regulations may provide that, in such circumstances as the Regulations prescribe, if two or more requests for information are made to a scheduled public authority –

(a) by one person; or

(b) by different persons who appear to the scheduled public authority to be acting in concert or in pursuance of a campaign, the estimated cost of complying with any of the requests is to be taken to be the estimated total cost of complying with all of them.