Technical provisions at Jersey Opera House Technical provisions at Jersey Opera House
Produced by the Freedom of Information officeAuthored by Department for the Economy and published on
18 March 2026.Prepared internally, no external costs.
Request 804831231
I understand that a report was compiled in summer 2025 by a Ms E Robbins regarding the technical provision at Jersey Opera House, and the JOH more broadly. Kindly release this report and it's findings
Response
The requested information is exempt under Article 35 of the Freedom of Information (Jersey) Law 2011
Article applied
Article 35 - Formulation and development of policies
Information is qualified exempt information if it relates to the formulation or development of any proposed policy by a public authority.
Public Interest Test
The following considerations were taken into account:
Public interest considerations favouring disclosure
• Disclosure of the information would support transparency and promote accountability to the general public, providing confirmation that the necessary discussions have taken place.
• Disclosure to the public fulfils an educative role about the early stages in policy development and illustrates how the department engages with parties for this purpose.
Public interest considerations favouring withholding the information
• In order to best develop policy and provide advice to Ministers, officials need a safe space in which free and frank discussion can take place – discussion of how documentation is presented and provided is considered as integral to policy development as iterations of documents are demonstrative of the policy development process.
• The need for this safe space is considered at its greatest during the live stages of a policy.
• Release of the information at this stage might generate misinformed debate. This would affect the ability of officials to consider and develop policy away from external pressures, and to advise Ministers appropriately.
• Premature disclosure of this information may limit the willingness of parties to provide their honest views and feedback. This would hamper and harm the policy–making process not only in relation to this subject area but in respect of future policy development across wider departmental business.
Considering all of the above, while transparency is important, the public interest in disclosure must be weighed against potential harm caused by distress or misinformation.