Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Budget transfer from Central Planning Vote to Grainville Phase 5

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 16 May 2016:

Decision Reference: MD-T-2016-0042

 

Decision Summary Title:

Central Planning Vote to Grainville Phase 5 (inclusive of provision for Music Services) capital head of expenditure, to fund a feasibility study

Date of Decision Summary:

11 May 2016

Decision Summary Author:

Finance and Information Manager

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/a

Written Report Title:

Central Planning Vote to Grainville Phase 5 (inclusive of provision for Music Services) capital head of expenditure, to fund a feasibility study

Date of Written Report:

11 May 2016

Written Report Author:

Finance and Information Manager

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject:  Acceptance of a Central Planning Vote (CPV) allocation of £175,000 to Grainville Phase 5 (inclusive of provision for Music Services) capital head of expenditure to fund a feasibility study on the proposed phase of the school improvement works.

Decision(s):  The Minister for Infrastructure requested that the Minister for Treasury and Resources approve a budget transfer of £175,000 in 2016 from the Central Planning Vote to Grainville Phase 5 (inclusive of provision for Music Services) to fund a feasibility study.

Reason(s) for Decision:  Funds are required to enable the feasibility study to proceed ahead of the anticipated main allocation of the budget in 2017, and it is estimated the study will cost a maximum of £175,000.              

Resource Implications:  As a result of this decision the newly created Grainville Phase 5 (inclusive of provision for Music Services) capital head of expenditure will be allocated a feasibility budget of £175,000. The Central Planning Vote budget will decrease by an identical amount. This decision does not change the total amount of expenditure that would be approved by the States for the next phase of the school, and following approval by the States of capital funding the amount received for the feasibility study will be transferred back to the CPV in the year in which capital funds are allocated. If, however, the States should decide not to approve the capital project, then it would be the responsibility of Education, Sport and Culture Department to repay the CPV from alternative sources of funding.

Action required:  The Finance Director to seek approval from the Minister for Treasury and Resources and then to action the budget transfer.  

Signature:

Position:

Minister for Infrastructure

 

Date Signed:  

 

Date of Decision:  

Back to top
rating button