Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Jersey Financial Services Commission: Codes of Practice: Civil Financial Penalties Regime: Law drafting instructions

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 21 February 2014:

Decision Reference:  MD-C-2013-0143

Decision Summary Title :

Law drafting instructions to implement a civil financial penalties regime

 

Date of Decision Summary:

19 February 2014

Decision Summary Author:

 

Director,

Finance Industry Development

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Law drafting instructions

 

Date of Written Report:

4 February 2014

Written Report Author:

Director,

Finance Industry Development

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Exempt

 

3.2.1(a)(xiv)

Subject:  

 

Jersey Financial Services Commission (“JFSC”): law drafting instructions to implement a civil financial penalties regime.

 

Decision(s):

 

The Chief Minister agreed to instruct the Law Draftsman to prepare legislation to provide the Financial Services Commission with the power to impose civil financial penalties for breaches of the Codes of Practice issued by the Commission under the Regulatory Laws.

 

Reason(s) for Decision:

 

The attached law drafting instructions request the Law Draftsman to commence the preparation of legislation that would provide the JFSC with the power to impose civil financial penalties for breaches of the Codes of Practice issued by the JFSC under the regulatory laws.

 

REASONS FOR THE LEGISLATION?

 

There are a number of reasons to grant the JFSC the statutory power to impose civil financial penalties for breaches of the Codes of Practice. Specifically, such a power would:

 

  • act as a further deterrent to those who persistently or seriously breach the Codes of Practice;
  • encourage prompt and consistent remediation of any breaches of the Codes of Practice;
  • provide the JFSC with more flexibility to deal with non-compliant behaviour;
  • provide some mitigation against compliant regulated businesses subsidising, through annual licence fees, the cost of regulatory action taken against those who are not; and
  • be in line internationally with other regulators.

 

With regard to the latter point, enhancing the JFSC’s range of sanctions would match that of comparable regulatory bodies such as the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, the Guernsey Financial Services Commission and, local bodies such as the Gambling Commission.

 

As with all policy development there may be particular issues that will be developed and necessitate some alterations from the initial drafting instructions.

 

 

Resource Implications:

 

There are no financial or manpower costs for the States.

 

The drafting resource required to implement the law drafting instructions will utilise drafting time paid for directly by the JFSC.

 

Action required:

 

The Chief Minister’s officers to pass the law drafting instructions to the Law Draftsman for action.

 

Signature:

 

 

Senator I.J. Gorst

Position:

 

Chief Minister of Jersey

 

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

Back to top
rating button