Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Criminal Justice (Amendment No 3) (Jersey) Law 201-

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 13 June 2014:

Decision Reference:  MD-C-2014-0105

Decision Summary Title:

Lodging of the Draft Criminal Justice (Amendment No. 3) (Jersey) Law 201-

Date of Decision Summary:

13th June 2014

Decision Summary Author:

Project & Research Officer

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title:

Criminal Justice (Amendment No. 3) (Jersey) Law 201-

Date of Written Report:

20th May 2014

Written Report Author:

Senior Legal Adviser

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject: Lodging of the Draft Criminal Justice (Amendment No. 3) (Jersey) Law 201-

Decision(s):  The Chief Minister agreed to lodge ‘au Greffe’ the Draft Criminal Justice (Amendment No. 3) (Jersey) Law 201- for debate by the States at the earliest opportunity.

Reason(s) for Decision:

The Legislation Advisory Panel has considered Article 4 of the Criminal Justice (Jersey) Law 1957 (the Law), which enables criminal courts in Jersey to allow time for the payment of fines.  The court concerned may direct payments by instalments, and may fix a term of imprisonment if any sum is not duly paid or recovered.

 

The Legislation Advisory Panel has recommended that the maximum sentence for non-payment of a fine should be linked to the maximum jurisdiction of the Magistrate to impose imprisonment, which would therefore become 12 months instead of 6 months.  The Legislation Advisory Panel has also recommended that the Law is amended to remove the limit of 12 months applicable to terms of imprisonment for non-payment of a fine imposed by the Royal Court, having concluded that the length of the sentence for non-payment could properly be left to the discretion of the Royal Court.  The order of the Royal Court by which the term of imprisonment is fixed is appealable, and so a person convicted is able to challenge the term fixed if he or she believes it to have been excessive.

Resource Implications:  There are no financial or manpower implications arising from this decision.

Action required: The Greffier of the States to be requested to arrange to lodge ‘au Greffe’ the Draft Criminal Justice (Amendment No. 3) (Jersey) Law 201- for debate by the States at the earliest opportunity.

Signature:

 

 

 

 

Position:

 

Deputy Chief Minister of Jersey

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision:

 

 

Back to top
rating button