Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Gender Recognition (Jersey) Law 200- Conscience Clause Amendment

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (20.01.2009) to approve an amendment to insert a Conscience Clause in the Gender Recognition (Jersey) Law 200-

Decision Reference:    MD-C-2009-0012 

Decision Summary Title :

Gender Recognition (Jersey) Law 200-

Conscience Clause Amendment

Date of Decision Summary:

14th January 2009

Decision Summary Author:

 

Kate Power

 

 

Policy and Research Officer

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

n/a

Written Report

Title :

Gender Recognition (Jersey) Law 200-

Conscience Clause Amendment

Date of Written Report:

13th January 2009

Written Report Author:

Andrew Metcalfe

 

 

Senior Assistant Legal Adviser

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:  Gender Recognition (Jersey) Law 200-  Amendment to insert a Conscience clause

 

Decision(s):  The Chief Minister approved an amendment to the Gender Recognition (Jersey) Law 200- to insert a Conscience Clause and asked that it be lodged ‘au Greffe’ as soon as is practicable.

 

Reason(s) for Decision: 

  1. As part of the preparation for the debate on the Law the Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister noted that a provision that had been included in original and subsequent drafts of the Law had, in error, been deleted from the final drafts of the Law.
  2. The provision in question amends the Marriage and Civil Status (Jersey) Law 2001 so that it will provide that a clergyman is not obliged to solemnise the marriage of a person if he or she reasonably believes that the person is of an acquired gender within the meaning of Article 1(2) of the Law.

 

Resource Implications:  All departments which will be affected have confirmed that financial implications are minimal. There are no additional manpower implications.

 

Action required:  Request the Greffier of the States to ensure that the amendment is lodged ‘au Greffe’ at the earliest opportunity for debate alongside the draft Law.

 

Signature:

 

 

Position:  Senator T. Le Sueur, Chief Minister

 

 

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back to top
rating button