Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Trusts (Amendment No. 7) (Jersey) 201-

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 26 January 2018:

Ministerial decision reference    MD-C-2018-0018

Decision summary title:  Trusts (Amendment No. 7) (Jersey) Law 201-

Decision summary author

Lead Policy Adviser, Financial Services

Is the decision summary public or exempt?  

Public

Report title  Lodging  of the Trusts (Amendment No. 7) (Jersey) Law 201-

Report author or name of

person giving report

Louise Richardson

Is the report public or exempt?

Public

Decision and reason for the decision

The Chief Minister approved the Trusts (Amendment No. 7) (Jersey) Law 201- (the ‘Draft Law’) and the attached report and signed the statement of compliance with the Human Rights (Jersey) Law 2000.  The Chief Minister further directed that the documents be lodged au Greffe for debate by the States at the earliest opportunity. 

The Draft Law proposed amendments to the Trusts (Jersey) Law 1984 to further clarify and improve the existing provisions in particular relating to the following: insertion of a new definition of ‘officer’; amendments to Article 9 (extent of application of law of Jersey) and to Article 9A (reserved powers) to recognise the availability of entities other than corporations such as the separate limited partnership and to make certain other clarificatory amendments including confirmation of a presumption of lifetime effect and that the settlor or the person to whom the power or interest is granted is not a trustee (at least as a result of that); reworking of Article 29 in connection with the disclosure of documents to beneficiaries (or others); deletion of a reference to a repealed Article in Article 30(11); changes to Article 38 dealing with accumulation of trust income; insertion of Article 43A to bring the security/indemnity provisions into one article to ensure no divergence in approach, with consequential amendments to Articles 34, 40 and 43; in addition extension of indemnity provision to employees (and similar persons) and the ability of the trustee or the employee to enforce the indemnity directly even if they are not party to the contract or arrangement in question; widening of the powers of the court to vary a trust in Article 47 in two limited situations.

 

Resource implications  

There are no financial or manpower costs for the State of Jersey arising as a result of the lodging of this legislation.

 

Action required  

The Greffier of the States to be requested to arrange for the relevant documentation associated with the Draft Law to be lodged ‘au Greffe’ for debate by the States at the earliest opportunity.

 

SIGNATURE:

 

POSITION:

 

Senator Ian Joseph Gorst

Chief Minister

DATE SIGNED

 

EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE DECISION

Back to top
rating button