Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Montreal Protocol 1988 - request for extension to Jersey

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (29.06.07) to request the extension of Jersey to the Montreal Protocol 1988.

 

 

Subject:

The Montreal Protocol 1988

Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts of Violence at Airports Serving International Civil Aviation, Montreal 1988

Decision Reference:

MD-C-2007-0040

Exempt clause(s):

no

Type of Report:

(oral or written)

No

Person Giving Report (if oral):

 

Telephone or

e-mail Meeting?

 

Report

File ref:

Int. C113

Written report – Title

 

Written report – Author

(name and job title)

 

Decision(s): The Chief Minister has decided that a request shall be forwarded to the UK government to ask that the Protocol to the Montreal Convention 1971, for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts of Violence at Airports Serving International Civil Aviation, Montreal 1988, should be extended to Jersey.

Reason(s) for decision:

The Montreal Convention was ratified by the UK on 25 October 1973, and ratification was at that time extended to Jersey at the request of the Island authorities. The Montreal Protocol was ratified by the UK on 15th November 1990, but was not extended to Jersey.

The Montreal Protocol supplements the provisions of the Montreal Convention 1971, to cover acts of violence committed against persons or facilities at airports serving international civil aviation.

The Aviation Security (Jersey) Order 1993 extends the Part 1 of the UK Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 to Jersey. Part 1 of this Act gives effect to the Montreal Protocol and enables Jersey to fulfil the legal obligations of the Protocol.

The States are committed to compliance with relevant and reasonable international treaties, and where possible to meet international standards through the extension of international conventions. The Chief Minister is responsible for the conduct of Jersey’s external relations in this regard.

Extension of ratification to Jersey may advance the Island’s international identity. Ratification would also provide evidence to support the reputation of Jersey as a responsible and cooperative administration in view of the forthcoming assessment by the IMF.

There are no manpower or resource implications arising.

Action required:

· Copy decision to the States Greffe

· Chief Minister’s Department to prepare a draft letter for transmission through the official channel to request that ratification of the Montreal Protocol 1988 is extended to Jersey

Signature:

Chief Minister

Date of Decision:

 

 

 

 

 

Our sites
Back to top
rating button