Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Census (Amendment No. 3) (Jersey) Law 201-

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 9 June 2010 regarding: Census (Amendment No. 3) (Jersey) Law 201-.

Decision Reference:  MD-C-2010-0049

Decision Summary Title :

Census (Amendment No. 3) (Jersey) Law 201-

Date of Decision Summary:

1st June 2010

Decision Summary Author:

Project and Research Officer

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Census (Amendment No. 3) (Jersey) Law 201-

Date of Written Report:

27th May 2010

Written Report Author:

Law Draftsman

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject: Census (Amendment No. 3) (Jersey) Law 201-

Decision(s): The Chief Minister decided to increase the fine for offences in the Census (Jersey) Law and approved the necessary draft legislation for lodging ‘au Greffe’.

Reason(s) for Decision: The next Census of the population will be held in Jersey on 27th March 2011. The penalty for offences in the Census (Jersey) Law 1951 is specified in Article 4(1) and is currently up to £500, the level of fine having last been increased in 1986.  

The UK population census will be held on the same day in 2011 as that of Jersey. The fine for census related offences in the UK is up to £1,000. It is therefore recommended that the Chief Minister lodge the Census (Amendment No. 3) (Jersey) Law 2010- whereby the fine is increased to up to £1,000 (corresponding to one half of level 3 on the Standard Scale of Fines).  

In order that the change in the Law might be active by Census Day 2011, it is proposed that the attached amendment be lodged with the States Assembly in the First Session of 2010. 

The change proposed in the Law is compatible with the Human Rights (Jersey) Law 2000.

Resource Implications:  Other than implications arising under any potential prosecution, there are no further financial or manpower implications.

Action required: The Greffier of the States to be requested to arrange for the Proposition to be lodged ‘au Greffe’ for debate.

Signature:

Position:   

Senator T.A. Le Sueur, Chief Minister

Date Signed:

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

Back to top
rating button