Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Employment (Amendment No. 6) (Jersey) Law 201- Lodged for debate

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 4 October 2010 regarding: Employment (Amendment No. 6) (Jersey) Law 201-  Lodged for debate.

Decision Reference:  MD-S-2010-0062

Decision Summary Title :

DS - Redundancy amendment Lodged

Date of Decision Summary:

4 October 2010

Decision Summary Author:

Policy Principal

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

WR - Redundancy amendment Lodged

Date of Written Report:

4 October 2010

Written Report Author:

Policy Principal

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject: Employment (Amendment No. 6) (Jersey) Law 201- lodged for debate

Decision(s): The Minister decided to lodge ‘au Greffe’ for States debate the draft Employment (Amendment No. 6) (Jersey) Law 201-.

Reason(s) for Decision: The draft amends Articles 60B, 60E, 60F and 60H of the new articles that would be inserted into the Employment (Jersey) Law 2003 by the Employment (Amendment No. 5) (Jersey) Law, 2010 (yet to be enacted). 

Article 60B is amended so that employees working less than 8 hours per week would qualify for a redundancy payment, in accordance with the Minister’s original intention. 

Article 60E is amended so that an employee who is made a reasonable offer of the same, or similar, suitable employment to start within four weeks would not be entitled to a redundancy payment, in accordance with the Minister’s original intention.  

Articles 60F and 60H would be amended so that the collective consultation requirements would be triggered when an employer proposes 12 or more employees for redundancy in a 30 day capture period; the protective award where an employer fails to consult with union representatives and elected staff representatives would be up to 9 weeks pay; and claims for a protective award would only be taken to the Tribunal by union representatives and elected staff representatives, rather than individuals, other than where representatives have not been appointed in accordance with the law.

Resource Implications: There are no financial implications.

Action required: Policy Principal to request the Greffier of the States Greffe to arrange to lodge ‘au Greffe’ the Proposition on 5 October 2010, for States debate on 16 November 2010.

Signature: 

Position:

Minister

Date Signed: 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

Back to top
rating button