Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Highlands Refurbishment Project - budget rationalisation

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (17.3.08) to approve budget transfers for the Highlands Refurbishment Project.

Decision Reference: MD-ESC-2008-0007

Decision Summary Title :

Highlands Refurbishment Project: Budget Rationalisation

Date of Decision Summary:

10/03/08

Decision Summary Author:

 

J.M.E. Harris,

Assistant Director,

Policy and Planning

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

n/a

Written Report

Title :

Highlands Refurbishment Project: Budget Rationalisation

Date of Written Report:

10/03/08

Written Report Author:

J.M.E. Harris

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:

Budget transfers in order to fund a budget shortfall in the Highlands Refurbishment project.

 

Decision(s):

 

The Minster supported the proposed budget transfers as set out in the attached report, and agreed that the Treasury and Resources Minister should be notified of this decision.

Reason(s) for Decision:

 

The proposed budget transfers are required to ensure that the Highlands refurbishment project can be fully funded by utilising savings achieved on other building projects relating to Education, Sport and Culture.

Resource Implications:

As set out in attached report.

 

Action required:

ESC Department to notify the Property Holdings Department of the Minister’s decision.

 

Signature:

 

 

Position:

Minister for Education, Sport and Culture

Date Signed:

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Highlands Refurbishment Project - budget rationalisation

 

1.                 Purpose of Report

The Minister is asked to support budget transfers in order to provide funding towards the estimated under-provision in the Highlands ‘A’ block refurbishment project.

2.                 Discussion

2.1.           The refurbishment of Highlands ‘A’ Block (the Turner building) is due to commence in July 2008 and will run for a period of 14 months, with completion planned for August/September 2009. The budget of £5,761,000 for this project has been approved as part of the States Capital Programme.

2.2.           A shortfall of £815,000 in the project budget has recently been identified, and this is due to a number of factors –

·        The need for additional funding for decant accommodation. A budget of £362,000 was identified in 2005 for this purpose, but the most recent cost estimates indicate that a further sum is required.

·        There has been some building deterioration since the original survey was conducted in 1999.

·        There are additional requirements resulting from new building control regulations.

2.3             The Property Holdings Department has carried out a review of unspent balances in capital projects relating to Education, Sport and Culture, and Table 1 below details the proposed budget transfers that would meet this shortfall –

Table 1

2.4    It will be recalled that the majority of property-related capital works under the administration of the Education, Sport and Culture Departments were transferred to Property Holdings with effect from 1 October 2006. The budgets for the Le Rocquier and Hautlieu developments were retained by ESC, as these projects are still ongoing.

2.5             The support of the Minister for Education, Sport and Culture is now being sought to the proposed transfer of £225,000 from the Hautlieu budget and £250,000 from the Le Rocquier budget in order to help meet the shortfall in funding for the Highlands project. The Property Holdings Department has carried out a review of the remaining commitments in both the Hautlieu and Le Rocquier project budgets and has confirmed that these two sums will not be required. The budgets for d’Auvergne and St. Clement Primary Schools lie outside the direct control of Education, Sport and Culture, but Property Holdings has confirmed that funding is also available from these two sources to help meet the shortfall.

 

3.         Recommendation

3.1      The decision to approve the proposed budget transfers rests with the Treasury and Resources Minister, but the support of the Education, Sport and Culture Minister is being sought for the transfer of sums from those two budgets which have been retained by ESC, namely Hautlieu and Le Rocquier.

3.2      It is recommended that the ESC Minister should support the proposed transfers, as this will enable the full completion of the Highlands refurbishment project.

           

Jeremy Harris,

Assistant Director, Policy and Planning

10th March 2008

 

 

Back to top
rating button