Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Immigration (Biometric Registration) (Jersey) Order 2018: Extension to Jersey by Order in Council

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 23 February 2018:

MINISTERIAL DECISION REFERENCE:   MD-C-2018-0037 

DECISION SUMMARY TITLE:  The Immigration (Biometric Registration) (Jersey) Order 2018: Extension to Jersey by Order in Council

DECISION SUMMARY AUTHOR:

Policy Officer, Community and Constitutional Affairs

IS THE DECISION SUMMARY PUBLIC OR EXEMPT?  

Public

REPORT TITLE:    The Immigration (Biometric Registration) (Jersey) Order 2018: Extension to Jersey by Order in Council

REPORT AUTHOR OR NAME OF PERSON GIVING REPORT: 

Legal Adviser, Law Officers’ Department

IS THE REPORT PUBLIC OR EXEMPT 

Public

DECISION AND REASON FOR THE DECISION:

In accordance with Article 31 of the States of Jersey Law 2005, the Chief Minister approved for lodging ‘au Greffe’ a draft report and proposition seeking the States’ approval that a request be made to the Privy Council for the making of an Order in Council that would extend to Jersey, with appropriate  modifications –

(a)    sections 5 to 15, and 61, of the UK Borders Act 2007; and

(b)    sections 9, 12(4), 13, 14, 77 of, and Schedule 2 to, the Immigration Act 2014

These provisions would empower the States to make Regulations in relation to biometric registration, in particular requiring biometric immigration documents to be used for specified immigration purposes and in connection with specified immigration procedures or in specified circumstances, where a question arises about a person’s status in relation to immigration or nationality.

The provisions will also empower the Minister for Home Affairs to require persons to pay a penalty for failing to comply with a requirement of such Regulations, subject to a right of appeal.

RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS:

There are no resource implications in deciding only that the States should have the power to make Regulations requiring persons subject to immigration control to apply for the issue of a biometric document, and to make related provision. 

Any further resource implications will depend on the provisions contained in the Regulations brought forward to enact these powers.

ACTION REQUIRED:

The Policy Officer to request the Greffier of the States to arrange for the draft report and proposition to be lodged ‘au Greffe’ in order that the States may signify their views on it, as provided for in Article 31 (1) of the States of Jersey Law 2005.

SIGNATURE:

 

 

 

 

 

POSITION:

 

Senator Ian Gorst

Chief Minister

 

 

DATE SIGNED:

EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE DECISION:

 

 

 

Back to top
rating button