Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Law Drafting Programme 2007: Bids for Inclusion.

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (30/03/2006) regarding Law Drafting Programme 2007: Bids for Inclusion.

Subject:

Law Drafting Programme 2007: Bids for Inclusion

Decision Reference:

MD – H SS- 2006-00026

Exempt clause(s):

n/a

Type of Report:

(oral or written)

Written

Person Giving Report (if oral):

-

Telephone or

e-mail Meeting?

-

Report

File ref:

(To insert)

Written report – Title

Law Drafting Programme 2007: Bids for Inclusion

Written report – Author

(name and job title)

Andrew Bannister, Corporate Planning and Performance Management.

Decision(s):

(a) To agree that the following bid for the 2007 Law Drafting Programme should be forwarded to the Council of Ministers for their consideration –

· The Regulation of Care (Jersey) Law 200-

(b) To approve the submission of a form to the Council of Ministers which –

(i) indicates whether the above bid should be regarded as ‘essential’ or ‘desirable’;

(ii) notes whether there are any items that can be dropped from the 2006 programme or from work in progress; and

(iii) provides an indicative list of items that are likely to be submitted for the 2008 and 2009 programme.

Reason(s) for decision:

Further information in support of the proposed inclusion of the item in the 2007 Law Drafting Programme is given in the Legislation Request Questionnaire that will be forwarded to the Council of Ministers.

Action required:

Andrew Bannister, Corporate Planning and Performance Management, will arrange for the Legislation Request Questionnaire to be forwarded to Jean-Marc Blanchet at the Chief Minister’s Department so that they may be collated and submitted to the Council of Ministers for their consideration.

Signature:

(Minister/ Assistant Minister)

Date of Decision:

30 March 2006

Back to top
rating button