10 La Colomberie, St Helier: Planning Application considered by Minister

Information about the publication of Ministerial Decisions

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision
providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 8 April 2011:

Decision Reference: MD-PE-2011-0042
Decision Summary Title	Planning Applications Panel – decisions considered by Minister		Date of Decision Summary:	8th April 2011.
Decision Summary Author:	Chief Officer Department of the Environment		Decision Summary: Public or Exempt?	Public
Type of Report: Oral or Written?	Written & Oral		Person Giving Oral Report:	Chief Officer Department of the Environment
Written Report Title	P/2010/1557 Report to PAP		Date of Written Report:	1 March 2011
Written Report Author:	Planning Officer		Written Report : Public or Exempt?	Public
Subject: P/2010/1557. 10 La Colomberie, St Helier. Construct 1 No. Dwelling. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION of refusal of Planning Permission.
Decision(s): The Minister resolved to MAINTAIN REFUSAL for the following reasons: The proposed development is not considered to be of sufficient high quality in design terms to be considered acceptable and would have a cramped and awkward relationship leading to an overdevelopment of the site. As such, the proposal would be contrary to Policy G2, G3 and H8 of the Island Plan 2002. The proposal would be contrary to Policy H8 of the Island Plan 2002 and to 'A Minimum Specification for New Housing Developments' established under Planning Policy Note 6 in that there would be no private and useable amenity space to serve the proposed new units of accommodation. The proposed development would be contrary to Policy H8 of the Island Plan 2002 and would not comply with the Parking Guidelines established under Planning Policy Note 3 (1988) in that the applicant has failed to demonstrate that there would be adequate parking provided to necessarily serve the proposed development.
Reason(s) for Decision: The Minister for Planning and Environment became aware that Planning Applications Panel (PAP) may not have been fully constituted for consideration of the above application and resolved to reconsider the application. The Minister considered all the relevant information including the information presented to the Planning Applications Panel. The decision to refuse permission has been upheld having taken into account the relevant policies of the approved Island Plan, together with other relevant policies and all other materials considerations, including the consultations and representations received.
Resource Implications: There are no resource implications.
Action required: Issue notifications of the decision as appropriate.
Signature: Senator FE Cohen		Position: Minister for Planning and Environment
Date Signed:		Date of Decision