Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

The Riddings, La Grande Route des Sablons, Grouville: Reduce height of trees on eastern boundary (HH/2013/1660): Determination of application by Minister

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 17 March 2013:

Decision Reference:   MD-PE-2014-0020

Application Number:  HH/2013/1660

(If applicable)

Decision Summary Title :

The Riddings,

La Grande Route des Sablons,  Grouville

Date of Decision Summary:

11th March 2014

Decision Summary Author:

 

Planner

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Oral and written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

Planner

Written Report

Title :

 HH/2013/1660

Date of Written Report:

24th February 2014

Written Report Author:

Planner

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:  The Riddings, La Grande Route des Sablons, Grouville, Jersey, JE3 9FR

 

Reduce height of trees on eastern boundary.

 

Decision(s):

 

Following a Ministerial meeting held in public on the 24th February 2014, the Minister deferred the item for accompanied site visits with the planning officer to the complainant and high hedge owner’s properties.  The site visits then took place on the 6th March 2014.  Following the site visits an internal meeting on the 11th March 2014 was held and the Minister decided:-

 

That the high hedge (Leylandi) (although now cut back on the eastern boundary) had from the photographic evidence received and discussions held with the relevant parties created loss of light which had adversely affected the reasonable enjoyment of the complaints property known as ‘La Cochere’, located to the east of the hedge owners property, ‘The Riddings’.

 

The Minister resolved to:-

 

Uphold the High Hedge Complaint but resolved to make amendments to Initial Actions 1 & 2 to read:-

 

Action 1: To reduce the height of the leylandi hedge along the eastern boundary to a height which is level with the ridge height of the main house roof of La Cochere and not to the ridge height of the dormer windows on the west elevation of La Cochere as originally recommended.

 

Action 2: The Leylandi (‘the hedge’) shall be maintained so that at no time does it exceed the ridge height of the main house roof of La Cochere when measured from its root base at ground level. 

 

 

 

 

 

Reason(s) for Decision:

 

The recent cutting back of the leylandi hedge along the boundary to La Cochere had significantly removed the previous loss of light concerns raised.  Retaining slightly more height to the leylandi hedge would not now unduly affect the light levels and amenities of the residents of La Cochere now that significant pruning had occurred and would also ensure that the private amenities of the residents to both properties was retained.

 

  1.              Initial Action

 

Reduce the height of the Leylandi hedge, for its entire length along the eastern boundary of ’The Riddings’, to a height which is level with the ridge height of main house roof of the property known as ‘La Cochere’, located to the east ‘The Riddings’.

 

Reason

The hedge is required to be reduced to this maximum height to reduce the problems caused by it, whereby it adversely affects the level of daylight enjoyed by the Complainant, whilst ensuring the survival of the hedge.

 

2. Preventative Action

 

The Leylandi (‘the hedge’) shall be maintained so that at no time does it exceed the ridge height of the main house roof of La Cochere when measured from its root base at ground level.  Further, branches which over hang the property, La Cochere, shall be cut back annually by a suitably competent person (tree surgeon), at cost to the hedge owner.

 

Reason

To ameliorate the impact of the hedge upon the adjacent property whilst seeking to ensure the survival of the hedge.

 

3. Time for Compliance

 

The Initial Action (1) shall be complied with in full within three months of the date when this Notice comes into effect.

 

Reason

To provide a reasonable period of time within which the Initial Action may be carried out.

 

INFORMATIVE:

 

Notwithstanding the time frame set out above the applicant’s attention is drawn to the comments set out by the Natural Environment Department dated 18th December 2013 as regards to the breeding & nesting periods of birds and squirrels.

Resource Implications:

 

Action required:

 

Issue Remedial Notice to Owner and Notify Complainant.

 

Signature:

 

Deputy R C Duhamel

PLeg / AS Initials

Position:

Minister for Planning and Environment

 

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

Back to top
rating button