Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Draft Howard Davis Farm (Partial Abrogation of Covenant) (Jersey) Law 200-.

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (20/12/2006) regarding Draft Howard Davis Farm (Partial Abrogation of Covenant) (Jersey) Law 200-.

Subject:

DRAFT HOWARD DAVIS FARM (PARTIAL ABROGATION OF COVENANT) (JERSEY) LAW 200-

Decision Reference:

MD-PH-2006-0104

Exempt clause(s):

N/A

Type of Report: (oral or written)

Written

Person Giving Report (if oral):

 

Telephone or

e-mail Meeting?

N/A

Report

File ref:

2/845/1

Written Report –

Title

Howard Davis Farm – Partial Abrogation of Covenant

Written report - author

P Tucker

- Assistant Director of Property Holdings

Decision(s):

The Minister approved the draft Howard Davis Farm (Partial Abrogation of Covenant) (Jersey) Law 200- and agreed that it be lodged ‘au Greffe’.

Reason(s) for decision:

To ask the States to adopt a law to allow the partial abrogation of the existing covenant, included as part of the original 1927 Deed of Gift by T B Davis, on parts of Fields 562, 827 and 828, Howard Davis Farm, Trinity, to allow the site to be used and leased, free of any conditions which currently require the land to be used as an agricultural training centre and experimental farm. This is to enable the construction and operation of a commercial dairy and milk processing facility together with ancillary uses.

Action required:

Minister to sign Statement of Human Rights Compatibility.

States Greffier to be requested to lodge the draft law and report for debate by the States Assembly as soon as possible and on or before the day that the Report and Proposition is lodged for the leasing of land in parts of Fields 562, 827 and 828, Trinity to the Jersey Milk Marketing Board or its successors.

Signature:

Assistant Minister

Deputy John Le Fondré

Date of Decision:

20 December 2006

Back to top
rating button