Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Employment Forum: Consultation on right to representation in disciplinary and grievance hearings (P.112/2011)

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 12 August 2011 regarding:

Decision Reference: MD-S-2011-0066

Decision Summary Title :

DS - Reference to Forum - Representation

Date of Decision Summary:

15 August 2011

Decision Summary Author:

 

Policy Principal

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

n/a

Written Report

Title :

WR - Reference to Forum - Representation

Date of Written Report:

15 August 2011

Written Report Author:

Policy Principal

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Subject: Right to Representation in disciplinary and grievance hearings

Decision(s): The Minister decided to direct the Employment Forum to consult on the right to representation in disciplinary and grievance hearings

Reason(s) for Decision: Part 7A of the Employment (Jersey) Law 2003 gives employees a right to representation by a fellow employee or a trade union official in formal disciplinary and grievance hearings. Reasonable process is further set out in a ‘Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures’ Code of Practice made under the Jersey Advisory and Conciliation (Jersey) Law 2003.

 

Deputy Hill’s Proposition (P.112/2011, due for States debate on 13 September) requests the Minister to bring for States approval an amendment to the Employment Law to provide that an employee is entitled to be represented by any person of their choice in a disciplinary or grievance hearing on the grounds that the current provisions may not be human rights compliant. The Minister intends to oppose the Proposition primarily on the grounds that legal advice has been taken and the Employment (Jersey) Law 2003 remains human rights compliant as drafted.

 

Following discussion with the Deputy, it appears that a more acceptable solution than legislative provision might be to amend the code of practice so that it outlines circumstances in which an employer should consider permitting different types of representatives. The Minister therefore directs the Employment Forum to consult on an amendment to the Code, to include in what circumstances employers should consider permitting employees to be represented in formal disciplinary and grievance hearings by other types of representatives.

Resource Implications: None

Action required: Policy Principal to refer the request to the Forum at the earliest opportunity

Signature:

 

 

Position:

Minister

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

Back to top
rating button