Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Assessment of Traffic Proposals within the EDAW Report - The Future Development and Regeneration of St. Helier.

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (27/02/09) regarding: Assessment of Traffic Proposals within the EDAW Report - The Future Development and Regeneration of St. Helier.

Decision Reference:  MD-T-2009-0020

Decision Summary Title :

Assessment of Traffic Proposals within the EDAW Report – The Future Development and Regeneration of St Helier

Date of Decision Summary:

13 February 2009

Decision Summary Author:

Manager

Transport Policy

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Assessment of Traffic Proposals within the EDAW Report – The Future Development and Regeneration of St Helier

Date of Written Report:

13 February 2009

Written Report Author:

Manager

Transport Policy

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:  Assessment of Traffic Proposals within the EDAW Report – The Future Development and Regeneration of St Helier

Decision(s):  The Minister supported in principle, and subject to further examination, consultation and cost benefit analysis:- 

  • The pedestrianisation of Halkett Place (south of Waterloo Street) in conjunction with a multi storey car park at Ann Court providing increased shopper and commercial parking for the area.
  • Widening of Francis Street to allow two way traffic.
  • Road narrowing and traffic calming of the road dividing the Parade Gardens (the east end of Gloucester Street).  
  • Road narrowing and traffic calming of the road between Route de la Liberation and the Esplanade by Liberation Square

 

The Minister did not support the following proposals:-

  • St Clements Road to become two way between Colomberie and La Route du Fort.
  • Pedestrianisation of York Street, Broad Street, and Colomberie (west end) / Hill Street.
  • Removal of the road dividing the Parade Gardens (the east end of Gloucester Street).
  • Creation of a two way route through La Motte Street for buses only.
  • Provision of a “gateway” roundabout at West Park.
  • Removal of the road between Route de la Liberation and the Esplanade by Liberation Square.
  • Closure of the Esplanade in front of the Pomme d’Or Hotel

Reason(s) for Decision:  Detailed analysis of the EDAW proposals have identified those proposals which have merit and can be progressed and those which are impractical.

Resource Implications:  Consultant support will be required to assist TTS officers in further investigating these proposals.  All the recommended schemes will have significant implementation costs which are currently undetermined and unfunded.

Action required:  Advise the Urban Task Force of the Minister’s decision and identify resources to further the approved schemes.

Signature: 

Position: 

Date Signed: 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed): 

Back to top
rating button