Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Royal Court (Amendment No. 16) (Jersey) Law 202-

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 23 December 2021

Ministerial decision reference    MD-C-2021-0116

Decision summary title   Draft Royal Court (Amendment No. 16) (Jersey) Law 202-

Decision summary author

Head of Policy, Justice

Is the decision summary public or exempt?  

Public

Report title  Draft Royal Court (Amendment No. 16) (Jersey) Law 202-

Report author or name of

person giving report

Head of Policy, Justice

Is the report public or exempt?

Public

Decision and reason for the decision: The Chief Minister decided to bring this Amendment to the Royal Court (Jersey) Law 1948 in order to modernise and improve the arrangements for Jurats’ retirement. This follows discussions between the Bailiff, Jurats and Law Officers.

This Amendment will allow Jurats who have served for at least 6 years to notify the Bailiff that they wish to retire with at least 6 months’ notice and make some other minor updates to the Law.

 

Resource implications: This amendment could have the potential for a marginal increase in the number of times the Electoral College must be convened to elect new Jurats, but this is understood to be manageable within the established resources for the Courts and related services.

Action required Officers to request the Greffier of the States to lodge the Amendment “au Greffe” for debate as soon as possible.

Signature

 

 

 

 

Position

Senator John Le Fondré

Chief Minister

 

 

 

 

 

Date signed

 

Effective date of the decision

 

Back to top
rating button