Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Le Squez Phase 4, Le Squez Road, St. Clement: Planning Application (P/2015/0616): Appeal Decision

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 2 June 2016:

Decision Reference:    MD- PE- 2016 – 0077

Decision Summary Title:

Appeal Decision – P/2015/0616

Le Squez Phase 4, Le Squez Road, St Clement

Date of Decision Summary:

01 June 2016

Decision Summary Author:

Judicial Greffier

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

n/a

Written Report

Title:

Report to the Minister for Planning and Environment

Date of Written Report:

31 May 2016

Written Report Author:

Philip Staddon BSc, Dip, MBA, MRTPI

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject:

Appeal under Article 108 of the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002 against a decision to grant planning permission at Le Squez Phase 4, Le Squez Road, St Clement (P/2015/0616)

Decision:

The Minister allowed the appeal in full and refused to grant permission to develop land under Article 116 of the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002;

In respect of the following development: “demolish existing buildings. Construct 18 No. one bedroom, 43 No two bedroom and 93 No. three bedroom Affordable housing flats with associated community facilities, car parking, stores and landscaping.”

To be carried out at Le Squez Phase 4, Le Squez Road, St Clement.

Reason(s) for Decision:

The Minister agrees with the conclusions of the Inspector as detailed within his report dated 31 May 2016 such that he considers the proposed development of Block B would have unreasonable impacts on the residential amenities and living conditions of numbers 27-32 Sarina Road.

The Minister notes the Inspector’s comments and recommendations for the potential resolution of the issues posed by the current form of proposed development but considers that, if minded to do so, the applicant should properly explore these through the normal planning application process where the full implications of any such change might be comprehensively considered and scrutinised by all parties in a manner that is consistent with established practices and procedures.

Resource Implications:-

None

Action required:

Request the Judicial Greffe to inform interested parties of the decision.

Signature:

Deputy S Luce

Position:

Minister for the Environment

Date Signed:

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

Back to top
rating button