Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

The Geneva Conventions Act (Jersey) Order 2011: Report and Proposition - Additional Protocol III

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 20 January 2011 regarding: The Geneva Conventions Act (Jersey) Order 2011: Report and Proposition - Additional Protocol III.

Decision Reference: MD-C-2011-0006

Decision Summary Title :

Additional Protocol III – Geneva Conventions

Date of Decision Summary:

12th January 2011

Decision Summary Author:

 

International Affairs

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

 N/A

Written Report

Title :

Additional Protocol III – Geneva Conventions

Date of Written Report:

12th January 2011

Written Report Author:

International Affairs

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:  The Geneva Conventions Act (Jersey) Order 2011

Decision(s): The Chief Minister agreed to lodge ‘au Greffe’ the Report & Proposition entitled ‘Geneva Conventions – Additional Protocol III: extension to Jersey’

 

Reason(s) for Decision: The Geneva Conventions Act (Jersey) Order 2011 implements the Additional Protocol III to the Geneva Conventions.

 

The Protocol introduces a new distinctive emblem, the red crystal, in addition to the existing red cross and red crescent, to be used in situations where the existing symbols might be wrongly perceived as having religious connotations. The Protocol puts the new emblem on the same legal footing as the existing emblems recognised by the Geneva Conventions.

 

Extension of the Protocol will enhance the international reputation of Jersey by sending a strong and positive message, demonstrating that Jersey stands alongside the rest of the international community in recognising the importance of the Protocol, as well as re-affirming its support for the institution of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).

 

Article 31 (1) of the States of Jersey Law 2005 states that:

 

Duty to refer certain matters to the States of Jersey

 

             (1)     Where it is proposed that –

 

             (a)    any provision of a draft Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom should apply directly to Jersey;…

the Chief Minister shall lodge the proposal in order that the States may signify their views on it.

 

Accordingly, it is proposed that the Chief Minister should lodge the attached Proposition so that the States may signify their view on the matter.

Resource Implications:  There are no manpower or resource implications.

 

Action required: The Greffier of the States is requested to arrange for the Projet to be lodged ‘au Greffe’ for consideration by the States at the earliest opportunity.

Signature:

 

Position: 

 

Senator T.A. Le Sueur, Chief Minister

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

Back to top
rating button