Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Cotswold, La Rue de L'Etocquet, St. John - Request for re-consideration.

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (26/08/2008) regarding: Cotswold, La Rue de L'Etocquet, St. John - Request for re-consideration.

Decision Reference:   MD-PE-2008 -0188

Application Number:  P/2007/1204

Decision Summary Title :

Cotswold, La Rue de L'Etocquet, , St. John

Date of Decision Summary:

12/08/08

Decision Summary Author:

Jonathan Gladwin

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Oral and written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

Jonathan Gladwin

Written Report

Title :

Request for reconsideration of condition at Cotswold, La Rue de L'Etocquet, St. John

Date of Written Report:

23/04/08

Written Report Author:

Jonathan Gladwin

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:  Cotswold, La Rue de L'Etocquet, St. John  

AMENDED PLANS: Demolish first floor conservatory and replace with new extension. Create new front entrance door with canopy and boiler room. Alterations to form enlarged kitchen, utility room and ensuite. Erect 8 No. solar panels and 2 No. roof lights. 2 new window openings at first floor to east elevation. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION regarding amending conditions 2 and 3 of planning permission.

Decision(s):

On the Ministerial meeting of the 20 May 2008 this request for reconsideration was heard. The Minister deferred a decision to consider the application further. On the 04 July 2008 the Minister decided to amend Conditions 3 and 4 to reduce the height of the privacy screen to the height shown on the approved plans and decided not to obscure glaze two of the windows.

Reason(s) for Decision:

The request to vary/amend the conditions were allowed as the Minister was satisfied that the proposals on balance did not cause an unacceptable loss of privacy to neighbouring properties. 

The two conditions in question were amended to read: 

3. As shown on the approved plans, the two bathroom windows in the east elevation of the property shall be fitted with obscure glass prior to the first occupation of the extension hereby permitted and thereafter permanently maintained. 

4. The privacy screen to the balcony shall be obscure glazed to a height as shown on the approved plans and shall be permanently retained in its approved position.

Resource Implications:

None 

Action required:

Notify Applicant and other interested parties

Signature:

PLeg / PT Initials

Position:

Minister for Planning and Environment

Date Signed:

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

04.07.08

Back to top
rating button