Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Noise Protection Scheme Measurement Results: Category A Housing Development Bel Royal

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 21 August 2009 regarding noise protection scheme measurement results at Bel Royal Category A housing development

Decision Reference:  MD-PE-2009-0119

Decision Summary Title :

DS – Category A Housing Development at Bel Royal – Noise Protection Scheme – Measurement Results

Date of Decision Summary:

19th June 2009

Decision Summary Author:

Roger Corfield

Principal Planner: Policy and Projects

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Written and Oral

Person Giving Oral Report:

Roger Corfield,

Principal Planner

Written Report

Title :

WR – Category A Housing Development at Bel Royal, St. Lawrence – Noise Protection Scheme – Implementation

Date of Written Report:

19th June 2009

Written Report Author:

Roger Corfield

Principal Planner: Policy and Projects

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject:  Proposed Noise Protection Scheme - Implementation.

Decision(s):

The Minister for Planning and Environment decided that the approved ‘noise protection scheme’ has been satisfactorily implemented to comply with PPG24 ‘Planning and Noise’ and WHO ‘Guidelines for Community Noise’, 1999 and delivers the benefits modelled in the ‘noise protection scheme’, on the basis of the evidence of noise measurements undertaken by Peter Brett Associates on behalf of Dandara Jersey Limited and submitted in a report dated April 2009.

Reason(s) for Decision:

·     To protect the amenities of future occupants of the approved properties at the Category A Housing Site comprising Fields 848, 851, 853 (part) and 854 (part), St. Lawrence from noise arising from the nearby Jersey Steel operations.

·     To effect compliance with the second part of Planning Condition No. 31 (Noise Exposure), which requires the implementation of the ‘noise protection scheme’ to the satisfaction of the Minister in consultation with Health Protection. 

·     To ensure that the completed development successfully meets the objectives of, and delivers the benefits modelled in, the ‘Noise Protection Scheme’.

Resource Implications:

None

Action required:

1.     Inform the land owner, local political representatives and Health Protection Services.

Signature: 

Position: 

Date Signed: 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed): 

Back to top
rating button