Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Employment (Awards) (Amendment) (Jersey) Order 201-

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 10 June 2011:

Decision Reference: MD-S-2011-0045

Decision Summary Title :

DS - Employment (Awards) (Amendment) (Jersey) Order 201-

Date of Decision Summary:

10 June 2011

Decision Summary Author:

Policy Principal

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

WR - Employment (Awards) (Amendment) (Jersey) Order 201-

Date of Written Report:

10 June 2011

Written Report Author:

Policy Principal

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject: Employment (Awards) (Amendment) (Jersey) Order 201-

Decision(s): The Minister made the Employment (Awards) (Amendment) (Jersey) Order 201-

Reason(s) for Decision: From 1 January 2011, employees have had the right to a statutory redundancy payment which may be enforced via the Employment Tribunal. However, with the maximum Tribunal award being capped at £10,000, the Tribunal could often find that it does not have the power to award an employee’s full statutory entitlements. To enable the Tribunal to fulfil employees’ statutory rights and minimise the risk of claimants bringing multiple proceedings to achieve this, the Tribunals’ award making powers will be extended as follows;

 

1. To retain the existing scale providing compensation for unfair dismissal, up to the maximum of 26 weeks pay, with the power to reduce the award in certain circumstances, and

 

2. To retain the £10,000 maximum only in respect of the total of any contractual amounts owed, and

 

3. The power to award the minimum statutory amounts as set out in the Employment Law, not subject to the £10,000 cap, including redundancy pay and notice pay.

Resource Implications: There are no financial or manpower implications. The amended Order would remove the risk of claimants lodging multiple Tribunal claims to enforce their statutory rights (avoiding increased administration and hearing costs).

Action required: Policy Principal to notify the Greffier of the States and the Law Draftsman that the Order has been made so that it may be notified to the States, and forward the signed and sealed Order immediately to the States Greffe for publication and archiving.

Signature:

 

 

Position:

Minister

 

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

Back to top
rating button