Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Income Support Medical Appeal Tribunal: Appointment of Panel Members

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 12 May 2017:

Decision Reference: MD-S-2017-0030

Decision Summary Title :

Recommendation for the re-appointment of Panel Members for the Income Support Medical Appeal Tribunal

Date of Decision Summary:

10 May 2017

Decision Summary

Head of Governance

Decision Summary:

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

NA

Written Report

Title :

Proposition to recommend the re-appointment of Panel Members for the Income Support Medical Appeal Tribunal’s

Date of Written Report:

10 May 2017

Written Report:

Head of Governance

Written Report :

 

Public

Subject: Income Support Medical Appeal Tribunal – Re-appointment of Panel Members

Decision(s): The Minister decided to lodge a proposition recommending the re-appointment of three Panel Members for the Income Support Medical Appeal Tribunal each for a further period of four years from the date of debate subject to States approval.

Reason(s) for Decision: Constituted under Article 9 of the Income Support (Jersey) Law 2007, the Income Support Medical Appeal Tribunal hears any appeals on matters regarding the award of the Impairment component of the Income Support scheme and any other decisions made on medical grounds; the assessment of care requirements under the Home Carer’s Allowance and care level assessments under the Long Term Care (Jersey) Law 2012.

 

Article 15 of the Income Support (General Provisions) (Jersey) Order 2008 provides that members of the Tribunal are appointed by the States, on the recommendation of the Minister, after consultation with the Jersey Appointments Commission and as in this case are eligible for a term of re-appointment. 

 

The Minister has consulted with the Tribunals Service and is satisfied that all three individuals proposed should be re-appointed and have the appropriate qualifications and experience required to continue in their roles.

Resource Implications: There are no financial or manpower implications

Action required:  Head of Governance to arrange for the proposition to be lodged ‘au Greffe’ and to request a States debate on 20 June 2017.

Signature:

 

 

Position:  Minister

 

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

Back to top
rating button