Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Home Farm, Le Mont de la Hague, St. Peter: Planning Application: (MS/2020/1646 & P/2020/1647): Appeal Decision

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 17 April 2023:

Decision Reference:  MD-ENV-2023-214

Public

Subject: Appeal Decision: MS/2020/1646 and P/2020/1647 (Home Farm, Le Mont de la Hague, St. Peter)

 

Report Title: Appeal Decisions: MS/2020/1646 and P/2020/1647 (Home Farm, Le Mont de la Hague, St. Peter)

Public

Decision(s):

The Assistant Minister decided to allow the appeals and granted planning permission and moveable structures consent, subject to conditions outlined in the Schedule of Conditions.

Reason for Decision(s):

The Assistant Minister noted and agreed with the findings, recommendations and reasoning of the Independent Planning Inspector and noted the two previous remittals from the Royal Court. The Assistant Minister also noted the unique characteristics and history of the appeal sites and in particular the fact that the Home Farm complex, or parts thereof, have been used for a significant period of time for non-agricultural purposes. Accordingly, the Assistant Minister considered that, within this context, the developments the subject of the appeals are not clearly proven to be in conflict with the economic enabling provisions of Policy PL5 of the bridging Island Plan. The Assistant Minister also accepted that there is negligible prospect of the appeal sites being returned to agriculture and that the storage of vehicles and storage containers / structures as currently exists on the sites does not impact adversely upon the special quality of the rural landscape. The Assistant Minister was satisfied that the terms of Policy NE3 of the bridging Island Plan have been complied with as neither of the developments appealed, either directly or indirectly, singularly or together, have caused harm to the landscape and that the character of the area has been protected. The Assistant Minister based the decision on the individual merits of the appeal cases and the unique circumstances of the sites and the history of Home Farm and, in this respect, does not consider that any precedent has been established for future decision making in cases involving similar developments within the Green Zone.

Resource Implications: There are no new financial and/or manpower implications arising as a consequence of this Ministerial Decision.

 

Action Required: The department to take necessary action.

Signature:

 

 

Signed By: Assistant Minister for the Environment

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

Back to top
rating button