Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Economic stimulus plan - second review by Corporate Scrutiny Panel - response by Minister for Treasury and Resources S.R. 2/2010 - P.55/2009

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 16 March 2010 regarding: Economic stimulus plan - second review by Corporate Scrutiny Panel - response by Minister for Treasury and Resources S.R. 2/2010 - P.55/2009.

Decision Reference:  MD-TR-2010-0043

Decision Summary Title:

Response to second report on Economic Stimulus Plan by the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel

Date of Decision Summary:

9th March 2010

Decision Summary Author:

Treasurer of the States

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title:

Ministerial Response: S.R. 2/2010 - Economic Stimulus Plan 2 (P55/2009) 

Date of Written Report:

12th March 2010

Written Report Author:

Acting Fiscal Stimulus Programme Manager

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject:

Response from the Minister for Treasury and Resources on the second review of the Economic Stimulus Plan by the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel.

Decision(s):

The Minister decided to present to the States his response to the second review undertaken by the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel on the Economic Stimulus Plan.

Reason(s) for Decision:

The Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel undertook a second review of the Economic Stimulus Plan.  A commentary in response is found in the attached Written Report.

Resource Implications:

None.

Action required:

Treasury and Resources’ Business Manager to arrange for the commentary on the Economic Stimulus Plan to be sent to the Greffe for presentation to the States at the earliest opportunity.

Signature: 
 
 

Position: Senator P F C Ozouf, Minister for Treasury and Resources 

                 

Date Signed:

Date of Decision:

Back to top
rating button