Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Employment (Jersey) Law 2003 - amendment of, law drafting instructions

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 1 October 2010 regarding: Employment (Jersey) Law 2003 - amendment of,  law drafting instructions.

Decision Reference:  MD-S-2010-0060

Decision Summary Title :

DS - Redundancy amendments

Date of Decision Summary:

28 September 2010

Decision Summary Author:

Policy Principal

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

WR - Redundancy amendments

Date of Written Report:

28 September 2010

Written Report Author:

Policy Principal

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject: Law drafting instructions to amend the Employment (Jersey) Law 2003

Decision(s): The Minister decided to instruct the Law Draftsman’s Office to prepare an amendment to the Employment (Jersey) Law 2003, that would be amended by the Employment (Amendment No. 5) (Jersey) Law 2010 (yet to be enacted).

Reason(s) for Decision: The Minister requests that the Law Draftsman prepares amendments to Articles 60B, 60E, 60F and 60H of the new articles that would be inserted into the Employment (Jersey) Law 2003 by the Employment (Amendment No. 5) (Jersey) Law 2010 (yet to be enacted). 

The first proposal would amend article 60B so that employees working less than 8 hours per week will qualify for a redundancy payment, in accordance with the Minister’s original intention. 

The second proposal would amend article 60E so that an employee who is made a reasonable offer of the same, or similar, suitable employment to start within four weeks of dismissal is not entitled to a redundancy payment, in accordance with the Minister’s original intention.  

The third proposal would amend articles 60F and 60H. The Employment Forum has consulted on the collective consultation procedure and the Minister has considered the Forum’s recommendations. The Minister proposes that the collective consultation requirements would be triggered when an employer proposes 12 or more employees for redundancy in a 30 day capture period; the protective award where an employer fails to consult with union representatives and elected staff representatives would be up to 9 weeks pay; and claim for a protective award would only be taken to the Tribunal by union representatives and elected staff representatives, rather than individuals, other than where representatives have not been appointed in accordance with the law.

Resource Implications: There are no financial implications.

Action required: Policy Principal to submit instructions to the Law Draftsman

Signature: 

Position:

Minister

Date Signed: 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

Back to top
rating button