Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Le Vignoble, La Rue de la Presse, St. Peter - request for re-consideration.

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (29/07/2008) regarding: Le Vignoble, La Rue de la Presse, St. Peter.

Decision Reference:   MD-PE-2008 -0186

Application Number:  P/2007/2794

Decision Summary Title :

Le Vignoble, La Rue de la Presse, St. Peter

Date of Decision Summary:

11.08.08

Decision Summary Author:

Elizabeth Ashworth

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Le Vignoble, La Rue de la Presse,  St. Peter

Date of Written Report:

17.04.08

Written Report Author:

Elizabeth Ashworth

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:  Le Vignoble, La Rue de la Presse, St. Peter 

Raise roof to create first floor. Construct balcony to west elevation and single storey extensions to east elevation. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION of refusal of planning permission.

Decision(s):

At the public meeting on the 20th May 2008 the Minister deferred making a decision in order to undertake a site visit with the architect and applicants.  The site visit took place on the 29th July when the Minister decided to maintain the decision to refuse the application.  

However the Minister advised that he would be prepared to consider a contemporary solution to providing accommodation in the first floor.  The Minister also suggested that the applicants consider demolishing and starting again with a completely new design as the existing structure constrains the potential development at first floor in a manner that meets the Minister’s requirement for high quality design.

Reason(s) for Decision:

Policy SO15 states that extensions and alterations will only be permitted where the proposal does not detract from the character or appearance of the setting. 

Policy C6 states that extensions and alterations may only be permitted where the scale and design would not detract from or unreasonably harm the visually sensitive character and scenic quality of the countryside.  It is considered that the proposals fail to meet these criteria for the reasons stated above.

Resource Implications:

None

Action required:

Notify Agent, Applicant and all other interested parties

Signature:

PLeg / PT Initials

Position:

Minister for Planning and Environment

Date Signed:

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

29.07.08

Back to top
rating button