Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

La Carriere, Grands Vaux - approval of report and proposition

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (04.06.07) to approve the report and proposition on La Carriere, Grands Vaux.

Subject:

Approval of Report & Proposition – La Carriere

Decision Reference:

MD-H-2007-0043

Exempt clause(s):

 

Type of Report: (oral or written)

WRITTEN

Person Giving Report (if oral):

 

Telephone or

e-mail Meeting?

 

Report

File ref:

Approval of REPORT & PROPOSITION

Written Report –

Title

Approval of Report & Proposition – La Carriere Rock Face Stabilisation

Written report - author

David Reid – Capital Projects Officer

Decision(s):

The Minister approved the Report & Proposition and directed that it be lodged for debate, and agreed to designate the necessary funding from the Housing Department’s Capital budget.

Reason(s) for decision

To ratify the boundary positions and permit the redevelopment.

Resource implications

Financial: £5,000

Manpower: NIL

Property: NIL

ICT: NIL

Law Drafting:NIL

Action required: Report & Proposition to be lodged for debate

Signature:

(Minister/ Assistant Minister)

Date of Decision:

 

 

 

 

 

La Carriere, Grands Vaux - approval of report and proposition

DATE OF REPORT: - 1 JUNE 2007

REPORT FOR THE HOUSING MINISTER

APPROVAL OF REPORT & PROPOSITION

LA CARRIERE, GRANDS VAUX

The Minister will recall that, the Housing Committee at its meeting of the 15th February 2002 supported the proposal to refurbish the 12 No.1 bedroom flats at La Carriere, Grand Vaux.

At the time, the Committee identified the need for a geotechnical survey to establish the stability of the rock face to the West of the estate; this was undertaken by Amplus Foundation & Structural Engineers in April 2003 and confirmed the precarious condition of the rock face.

Their recommendation is that the rock face be stabilized prior to the refurbishment of the accommodation. To properly undertake the stabilization works and following advice from the Law Officers Department, it is seen as vital that the boundaries of the site to the following properties be ratified;

  Northern boundary with Bas Des Ruisseaux, owned by Mr Haycock.

  Western boundary with Field no. 1410A, owned by Miss W Le Vavasseur dit Durell.

  Southern boundary with Kerroch (formerly known as “Kobenhaven”) owned by Mr & Mrs Le Couillard.

It is likely that the Public will need to enter into deeds of arrangement for this purpose with all three parties and that it will need to meet their reasonable legal costs necessary to facilitate the agreements and that the approval of the States will be required for these transactions. A Report and Proposition is attached hereto.

Recommendation

It is recommended that the Minister:

1. Approve the attached Report & Proposition and direct that it be lodged for debate.

2. Approve the designation of the necessary funding form the Housing Departments Capital budget.

D Reid

Capital Projects Officer

1-6-07

 

Back to top
rating button