Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Remuneration of Tribunal Members.

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (03/07/2009) regarding: Remuneration of Social Security Tribunal Members.

Decision Reference: MD-S-2009-0026

Decision Summary Title :

Remuneration of Tribunal members

Date of Decision Summary:

3 July 2009

Decision Summary Author:

Janice Waddell

Compliance and Governance Director

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Remuneration for Tribunal Appointments

Date of Written Report:

26 May 2009

Written Report Author:

Janice Waddell

Compliance and Governance Director

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:

Remuneration rates for Tribunal members

Decision(s):

The Minister agreed to the recommended rates of remuneration for Tribunal Members for the Social Security, Social Security Medical Appeal and the Income Support Medical Appeal Tribunals, for attending Tribunal sessions.

Reason(s) for Decision:

With increasing numbers of appeals, some level of remuneration is appropriate to Tribunal members who give their time.

Resource Implications:

There are no manpower implications.  The total estimated cost of remuneration is estimated to be £15,000 in 2009 and can be met from the allocated budget.

Action required:

Janice Waddell to ensure that procedures are in place to provide remuneration to Tribunal members.

Signature: 

Position:

Minister

Date Signed:

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed): 

Remuneration of Tribunal Members.

Consideration of remuneration for Income Support and Social Security Tribunals  
 

Introduction  

The Income Support and Social Security legislation provides for Tribunal members to be given such remuneration and expenses as the Minister may determine 1 .  This includes the Income Support Medical Appeal Tribunal which hears appeals regarding award of the Impairment Component and the Social Security Tribunal which hears appeals on all other matters of Income Support as well as social security matters.  Members of the Social Security Medical Appeal Tribunal 2 which hears appeals on Long Term Incapacity Allowance already receive an hourly rate of remuneration.  However as the members are medical practitioners who may also sit on the Income Support Medical Appeal Tribunal, it is reasonable to have one system of remuneration.   

In 2008, the Minister considered and agreed the principle of remuneration. Tribunals had traditionally been an honorary service but recruitment of new members, particularly professionals, was difficult without some remuneration.  In addition, a precedent had been set by the Employment Tribunal which already remunerates all panel members. 

The Minister consulted the Bailiff on the level of remuneration for the Legal Chair to ensure appropriate levels when compared to other Tribunals and Courts. 

This paper proposes remuneration levels for Income Support and Social Security Tribunal members. 
 

Levels of Remuneration for the Chair  

The Bailiff considered that the honorary tradition should be preserved where possible but acknowledged that there would be some limitation on time for people and so remuneration was appropriate.  He further commented that fees paid should bear a proper relationship to other courts and tribunals and noted that the Income Support and Social Security Tribunals have powers akin to the UK’s Social Security and Child Support Tribunal.  Therefore it is proposed that remuneration for the Chair(s) of the Jersey Tribunals is based on that UK rate, but with a 10% Jersey weighting. 

The level of remuneration is set to include preparation time and completion of decision-summary. 
 

Levels of remuneration for other panel members  

The Income Support Medical Appeal Tribunal includes a Medical Practitioner.  Primary Care in Jersey is private practice and so if a doctor is not available to see patients, he is unable to generate income 3 .  It is reasonable to propose remuneration at the same rate as the Chair.  For both professions, the rate is less than they would expect to generate in their normal business.  

The Employment Tribunal has a structured remuneration for lay members and it is proposed that this rate is used for lay members in the Social Security and Income Support Tribunals.  It should be noted that the higher “Professional” rate is only paid where the member is required to be of a profession.  If, for example a doctor were to sit on a panel as a lay member, he would receive the lay member rate. 
 

Proposed rates  

Tribunal

Constitution

Remuneration daily rate

Social Security Tribunal

Legal Chair

2 lay members

£440

£102.01

Social Security Medical Appeal Tribunal

3 Medical Practitioners

£440

Income Support

Medical Appeal Tribunal

Legal Chair/Deputy Chair

1 medical practitioner

1 lay member

£440

£440

£102.01

 
 

The Tribunals normally sit for half day sessions and are paid pro rata.  The remuneration is to cover any preparation to hear the appeal and completion of the Tribunal decision which must be in writing. 
 

Costs 

There were 10 appeals in 2008 which, on the proposed rates would have cost circa £5,000.  There have been 3 appeals this year as at 12 March 2009.  It is possible that the number of appeals will rise in 2009 as claimants become more familiar with Income Support and the Appeals process.  However, the process of undertaking a second determination on claims prior to appeal undoubtedly reduces the number of claimants who do go on to a full appeal. 

The table below shows the estimated number of appeals and type in 2009.  It is assumed that the Tribunals will be held in half day sessions. 
 

 

Tribunal

No. of appeals

Daily cost

Annual cost

Social Security Tribunal 

20

£644

£6,440

Social Security Tribunal (bound to fail)4

10

£440

£2,200

Social Security Medical Appeal

5

£1,320

£3,300

Income Support Medical Appeal

5

£982

£2,455

 

The total cost estimate for 2009 is £15,000. 
 

Review of rates 

Rates should be reviewed annually with any increase to be considered with reference to the Earnings Index and rates for other Tribunals and Courts.  
 

Recommendations 

It is recommended that the Minister agree the proposed rates of remuneration for Tribunal members, paid on a pro rata basis for daily rates. 

1 Article 15 of the Income Support (Jersey) Law 2007 & Article 33A of the Social Security (Jersey) Law 1974

 

2 the Tribunal consists of 3 medical practitioners

 

3 only one general practitioner came forward, others expressed an interest but required assurance of income maintenance before putting theirs names forward.

 

4 These are reviewed by the Chair alone where considered legislation is clear that appeal would not be successful

 

Back to top
rating button