Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Social Security (Reciprocal Agreement with Chile) (Jersey) Act 201-

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 30 March 2015:

Decision Reference:  MD-ER-2015-0023

Decision Summary Title :

Social Security – Reciprocal Agreement with Chile

Date of Decision Summary:

18 March 2015

Decision Summary Author:

 

External Relations

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

 

Written Report

Title :

Report of the Minister for Social Security:

 

Draft convention on social security

between the Government of the Republic of Chile

And the Government of the United Kingdom of

Great Britain and Northern Ireland

 

 

Date of Written Report:

18 March 2015

Written Report Author:

Social Security

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:  Social Security – Reciprocal Agreement with Chile

 

Decision(s):  The Minister for External Relations decided to lodge ‘au greffe’ the Social Security (Reciprocal Agreement with Chile) (Jersey) Act 201-, with an accompanying report of the Minister for Social Security.

 

Reason(s) for Decision:

On 21 April 1998, the States adopting a proposition of the then Employment and Social Security Committee, requested the Bailiff to inform the Secretary of State that it was the wish of the Assembly that certain Conventions on Social Security between the Government of the United Kingdom and other Governments should apply to Jersey.  One of those Conventions related to the Republic of Chile. 

The Social Security agreement with Chile was signed by the UK Secretary of State on 13th March 2012 and the respective procedures for each country to complete ratification were both completed on 10 March 2015.  In accordance with Article 13 of the agreement, the Convention will come into force on 1st June 2015.

The Act gives effect in Jersey to the convention establishing a reciprocal agreement on social security between the Governments of Chile and the United Kingdom and would come into force on the 1st June 2015, to bring Jersey’s social security legislation into line with the agreement on the same date as the agreement itself comes into force.

Resource Implications:  There are no resource implications.

 

Action required: External Relations to request the Greffier of the States to arrange for the draft Act and accompanying Report to be lodged ‘au Greffe’  for debate as soon as possible.

 

Signature:

 

Position: 

Minister for External Relations

 

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

Social Security (Reciprocal Agreement with Chile) (Jersey) Act 201-

REPORT OF THE MINISTER FOR SOCIAL SECURITY

 

 

DRAFT CONVENTION ON SOCIAL SECURITY

BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CHILE

AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF

GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND

 

 

In 1997 the Chilean Authorities made an approach to the United Kingdom Authorities requesting that consideration be given to establishing a full Social Security Reciprocal Agreement. The United Kingdom responded to say that they would not be prepared to enter a full Agreement, but would be prepared to negotiate a contributions only Agreement. Chile agreed to proceed on this basis. As is customary, Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man were separately invited to be included in the agreement and all three Crown Dependencies agreed. The invitation and response was conveyed through official channels.

 

The initial round of negotiations was held in Santiago, Chile in January 1998. The next round of negotiations was due to take place in London, which in the event did not take place and negotiations stalled.

 

The Jersey Social Security Department heard little more about the proposed agreement with Chile until contact was made recently by HM Revenue & Customs - Tax Treaty Team.   In their communication they explained that Chile had expressed an interest in resuming talks on a contributions only Reciprocal Agreement. The UK authorities agreed to this request and made contact with Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man to ascertain whether they were still minded to be party to an agreement with Chile. 

 

Negotiations recommenced in early February 2011 and a draft Convention was constructed.  The Convention follows the normal structure of a contributions only Reciprocal Agreement.  The text of the Convention conforms to the usual pattern –

 

  • Article 1 – the interpretation Article which defines the terms used in the Convention
  • Article 2 – describes the legislation covered under the Convention
  • Article 3 – describes the personal scope of the Convention
  • Article 4 – is the main reciprocity or equal treatment provision of the Convention
  • Articles 5 to 8 – these Articles determine  where contributions should be paid as workers move between countries
  • Article 9 – allows the competent Authorities to modify the provisions of the Convention
  • Article 10 – deals with administrative arrangements
  • Article 11 – provides the means by which any disputes should be resolved
  • Articles 12 to 15 – deal with transitional arrangements, the coming into force and life of the Convention and rights of individuals should the Convention be terminated

 

There are no financial or manpower implications for the States of Jersey.

 

 

 

Explanatory Note

 

Article 48 of the Social Security (Jersey) Law 1974 enables the States, for the purpose of giving effect to a reciprocal agreement with respect to certain matters relating to social security, to make provision by Act for modifying or adapting the 1974 Law in its application to cases affected by the Convention. This Act enables that Law to be construed as being modified or adapted as required to give effect to the Convention on Social Security between the Republic of Chile and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in its application to cases affected by the Convention.

 

Back to top
rating button