Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Patient Air Transfers - Contract.

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (18/05/2007) regarding: Patient Air Transfers - Contract.

Subject:

Patient Air Transfers – Contract

Decision Reference:

MD-H SS-2007-0032

Exempt clause(s):

 

Type of Report:

(oral or written)

Written

Person Giving Report (if oral):

 

Telephone or

e-mail Meeting?

 

Report

File ref:

 

Written report – Title

Patient Air Transfers Supplementary Report

Written report – Author

(name and job title)

Richard Jouault, Director, Corporate Planning & Performance Management

Decision(s):

The Minister approved the acceptance of the tender from Capital (Trading) Aviation Ltd for the provision of aero medical transfer of patients to and from Health and Social Services Department.

Reason(s) for decision:

The current arrangements for aero medical transfer are delivered on an ad hoc basis using a variety of aircraft operators. This approach may result in a diminished quality of service. Service quality will be improved by contractual arrangements with a single provider or consortium.

Action required:

The Director, Corporate Planning & Performance Management is required to prepare a contract between Health and Social Services Department and Capital (Trading) Aviation Ltd

Signature:

(Minister for Health and Social Services)

Date of Decision:

18 May 2007

 

 

 

 

 

Patient Air Transfers - Contract.

Ministerial Decision- Patient Air Transfers

Supplementary Report

Background

The Health & Social Services Department (HSSD) chartered aircraft for 158 emergency patient transfers to UK hospitals in 2005. This included the transfer of critically ill incubated babies. Jersey figures suggest that between 1 and 9 infants (medical, surgical and cardiac) are transferred ex-utero per year. A further 3 infants are delivered on the mainland following in-utero transfer, and require repatriation.

This service was predominantly delivered by four main aircraft operators at a total cost of over £1 million. This cost does not include the significant administrative time spent by HSSD personnel attempting to contact an available aircraft operator and coordinating the transfer from Jersey General Hospital to ambulance, to aircraft and receiving UK hospital.

Issues

The current ad hoc arrangements with multiple providers for air transfer present the organisation with the following risks:

  Potential to delay emergency transfer of critically ill patient due to burdensome process of identifying an available air operator.

  Increased staff costs resulting from HSSD staff failing to be repatriated following transfer out of hours.

  Increased risks to patients and staff from the use of non standardised aircraft minimising the opportunity to standardise equipment and training.

Recommended Action:

Develop contractual arrangement with single aircraft operator to manage all air transfers.

 

Back to top
rating button