Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Health Insurance (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Jersey) Law 201-

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 9 September 2010 regarding: Health Insurance (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Jersey) Law 201-.

Decision Reference: MD-S-2010-0055

Decision Summary Title :

Health Insurance Fund  (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Jersey) Law 201-

Date of Decision Summary:

17th August 2010

Decision Summary Author:

Chief Officer – Social Security

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Health Insurance Fund  (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Jersey) Law 201-

Date of Written Report:

17th August 2010

Written Report Author:

Chief Officer – Social Security

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject: Health Insurance Fund  (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Jersey) Law 201-

Decision(s): The Minister approved and decided to lodge ‘au Greffe’ the draft Health Insurance Fund  (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Jersey) Law 201-

Reason(s) for Decision: In accordance with the Draft Annual Business Plan 2011, to bring legal effect to the transfer of £6.131 million from the Health Insurance Fund in 2011 for the funding of primary care services funded by the Health and Social Services Department.  The legislation also allows a similar transfer in 2012, whilst a Health Care Strategy is developed and implemented to address the delivery, funding and sustainability of primary health care in the Island.  In addition the proposal allows the Health Insurance Fund to fund the development of Primary Care governance and delivery of standards of care, as proposed in P36/2010, ahead of the development of new Primary Care legislation.

Resource Implications: There are no permanent manpower implications of the proposition.  The financial implications are specified in the report to the draft legislation and will be met from within the surplus of the Health Insurance Fund.

Action required: Policy and Strategy Director to request the Greffier of the States to arrange for the draft legislation to be lodged ‘au Greffe’ for consideration by the States in due course.

Signature: 

Position:

Minister

Date Signed: 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

Health Insurance (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Jersey) Law 201-

Health Insurance Fund (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Jersey) Law 201-

Report

Background

 

The Health Insurance Fund (the “Fund”) was established when the Health Insurance (Jersey) Law 1967 (the “Law”) came into force on 4th December 1967. The Fund receives a set percentage allocation of all social security contributions collected under the Social Security Law, which is currently 2% (made up of a 0.8% contribution from employees and a 1.2% contribution from employers) of the 12.5% total contributions collected.

 

The Law specifies that the Fund is to use the contributions received to meet primary health care costs, which are currently limited to medical and pharmaceutical benefits. The level of medical benefit is set by the States by Regulation and was increased this May to assist in establishing General Practitioner governance arrangements. Currently the Fund subsidises patients to the tune of £19 for each GP visit and also covers the cost prescriptions dispensed by Community Pharmacists.

 

Since 1967 the scope of primary care has expanded greatly and many different healthcare professions are now involved in first-line medical and healthcare treatment and care.  Typically, primary care is provided in a community setting, such as a GP surgery or a health centre.   In Jersey, some primary care services are delivered from the General Hospital.

 

The Health and Social Services Department funds a number of primary care services,  some of which are provided directly and some through third-party organisations, in particular Family  Nursing and Home Care.

 

Transfer of funds

 

This proposition would bring into effect the funding arrangement set out in the 2011 Business Plan, to be debated in September 2010.  In order to provide  the Health and Social Services Department with the full value of its proposed budget for 2011, it is necessary to bring a proposition to draw on funds currently held in the Health Insurance Fund.

 

The Draft Business Plan 2011 identifies a £4.9 million contribution from the Health Insurance Fund to fund growth in Health & Social Services expenditure and a further £930,000 primary care service costs transfer from the Fund as part of the Health and Social Services 2% Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR) proposals. It is further proposed that an additional £301,000 should be met by a transfer from the Health Insurance Fund to partially fund diabetic supplies and dietary, oxygen and continence products. This would remove these “user pays” elements from within CSR 2011 proposals (Ref HSS-UP 1/2 in the 2011 Business Plan P99/2010).

 

The draft Law provides for a transfer of funds in 2011 in the total sum of £6.131 million.  Article 2 of the draft Law allows the Minister to return to the States and seek a similar transfer in 2012.  The value of this transfer will be determined during 2011 and will need to be approved by the States before it can take place.

 

There is no provision made for any further transfers and the Minister for Health and Social Services has made a clear commitment to address the issue of primary care health services within this two year period.  Legislation to replace or substantially revise the current Health Insurance Law will be brought forward before 2013.  Given the continuing pressures on health services this is likely to include the requirement for increased contributions to fund a modern primary care health service.

 

The ring fencing of  Social Security and Health Insurance Funds is of paramount importance and the agreement with the Minister for Health and Social Services to propose this draft law has not been undertaken lightly.   However, given the ongoing requirement for additional funding across primary and secondary health care, the transfer of agreed sums to be allocated to the funding of specific primary health care services, currently funded by HSSD,  is considered to be reasonable in the circumstances. It will allow funds to be released from existing HSSD budgets to meet the cost of essential growth in HSSD funded areas, as set out in the 2011 Business Plan.

 

The release of the £6.131 million to the Health & Social Services Department in 2011 will be tightly controlled by the Treasury and Resources Minister.  The Treasury and Resources Minister will only sanction the release of funding upon receipt of evidence from the Health & Social Services Department confirming expenditure in respect of Primary Care services.   The balance of the cost of primary care services administered through HSSD will continue to be funded directly from the HSSD revenue budget

 
 

Primary Care Services

 

Whilst the intent of the 1967 Law has generally served the Island well, it is increasingly recognised that there is now a need, some 43 years later, to review and revise aspects of the law. New Primary Care legislation needs to support a contemporary range of primary care services and to establish a rigorous local governance framework as required by UK primary care regulators. The attached draft law (Article 3) provides funding for the introduction of new arrangements for the delivery and regulation of Primary Care.

 

Primary care services are the first point of contact that individuals and their families have with health and social care services. Currently in Jersey, many different health professionals working for a range of private and public sector organisations are involved in providing these services

 

The Minster for Health & Social Services is responsible for the development of primary health care policy in Jersey and The Minster for Health & Social Services is aiming to achieve primary health care services that include:

 

·     universal basic health care and the first point of contact that individuals and families normally have with health services

 

·     services delivered to individuals and families in non-hospital settings, for example, health visiting services from Family Nursing and Home Care

 

§     Preventative services to help people before they get ill, for example, breast and

      cervical cancer screening and avoiding heart disease

 

§     Programmes of care for the improved management of chronic diseases such as

      diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and depression

 

In the UK, longstanding policy has been to strengthen the role of primary care services through a strategy of shifting the balance of care away from hospitals. To date this trend has not been seen in Jersey.  This must, at least in part, be due to the inflexibility of the 1967 Health Insurance Law in which medical benefit is linked exclusively to services provided personally by GPs. There has been a tendency to develop and fund separate primary care services from within the Health & Social Services Department (HSSD).

This has meant that care provided by GPs and other community-based services have evolved in entirely separate ways and remain poorly integrated, despite similarities in the services they provide. This lack of integration has hindered improved outcomes for patients in a number of areas including that of disease prevention.

 

The Health & Social Services Department has produced a list of primary care services that it currently funds and this appears as Appendix 1. The list identifies a total cost in excess of £6.9 million of primary care services based in the community and/or community and hospital settings.

 
 

Review

 

In the longer term, and in the interests of delivering more fully integrated services, there will need to be significant structural changes to the way primary care services are funded and delivered. This is to be the subject of a detailed review that will form part of the Comprehensive Spending Review and parallel work in relation to implementing the Fiscal Strategy.

 

The review will consider how those services are best delivered in the future to achieve the maximum health benefit for the population whilst delivering value for money.  Hence the options of continuing to deliver them through the hospital or through primary care providers will form a key part of the review.  Revised legislation will substantially amend or replace the current 1967 Law.

 
 
 
 

Regulation and quality standards in Primary Care

 

In unanimously agreeing to an increase in the Medical Benefit from £15 to £19 in May 2010 (P36), the States Assembly took the very important first step towards establishing a framework for the improvement of health and primary care for the community developed in partnership between the States and GPs.

 

A cornerstone of these improvements will be the introduction of primary care governance, quality standards and the ability to collect vital information relating to the health of the Island’s population

 

All doctors wishing to practise medicine in Jersey need to meet the requirements of the UK General Medical Council (GMC). To establish a framework of local accountability required by the GMC, “Performers List” legislation will need to be drafted.  This will require GPs in Jersey to participate in:

 

·     annual appraisal;

·     local clinical governance, audit and complaints processes.

 

They must also be in good standing with the GMC.

 
 

These Regulations will form part of the updated Primary Care Law and will be brought to the States in due course for the consideration of the Assembly.  The Regulations will establish a small team led by a Primary Care Responsible Officer (employed by the States) with associated administration and support. This will allow arrangements to be put in place consistent with those used for GPs in the UK.

 

The Performers List legislation will establish the role of this governance team and its powers and will also establish from where the costs will be met.  As explained in P36, the expectation is that the costs, which will not exceed £200,000 per annum, will be met from the Health Insurance Fund.

 

However, ahead of bringing forward that legislation, funding is needed to develop the systems and arrangements to introduce governance locally.  This proposition proposes that it be made explicit that the associated development costs will be met from the Health Insurance Fund.

 

The Report to P36, not only laid out the high-level plans for introducing improved governance of general practice in Jersey, but also a framework for improved and demonstrable quality of primary care through the introduction of payments dependent upon performance against a set of Clinical and Organisational Quality Standards.

 

The Jersey Quality Improvement Framework will promote and incentivise consistency of care by GPs for a number of common medical conditions, such as heart disease, diabetes, stroke, asthma and chronic lung disease, that otherwise have the potential to cause significant ill-health, hospital admissions or early death.

To provide modern primary care services it is also important to establish a new central repository of patient records.   The advantages of such a system include:

 

·     compiling health records and disease registers at a single location;

·     providing robust data to guide the future development of health strategy and policy; and

·     allowing patient records to be accessed electronically by the GP out-of-hours co-operative and therefore delivering a significant improvement in the quality of care that can be delivered by the GP out-of-hours co-op.

 

It is anticipated that such a system will be integrated with the new Health & Social Services computer system.  The stated intent of P36 was that such a system would also be funded from the Health Insurance Fund.

 

Clearly the establishment of such a central repository of sensitive personal data will require very careful design and strong safeguards to ensure that information is only accessed with the agreement of the patient concerned.  A key part of the project will be to protect sensitive data and the rights of those who do not wish that data to be accessed by anyone other than their own GP. 

 

An exercise in respect of the scope and feasibility of such a project is currently underway.  However the costs of implementation are not expected to exceed £1 million.

 

Article 3 of the Proposition seeks to provide clarity within current legislation such that ahead of the drafting of new Primary Care legislation to include Performers List regulations, the costs of essential work to advance the new information system, quality framework, the necessary commissioning underpinning payments arising from performance against standards and the Primary Care governance team, are funded from the Health Insurance Fund.

 

Financial and manpower implications

 

There are no permanent additional manpower implications arising directly from this proposition; any short term manpower implications arising from Article 3 will be managed from within existing manpower budgets.

 

The financial implications are for the years 2011 and 2012 only and will be met from within the accumulated surplus within the Health Insurance Fund, which amounted to £77m as at 31 December 2009. 

 

The accumulated surplus within the Health Insurance Fund is designed to provide for the increasing cost of current medical and pharmaceutical benefits as the proportion of elderly people increases significantly over the next 20 to 30 years.  Drawing funds down now and extending the scope of the Law to fund a modern primary care health service  will require additional contributions to be levied in coming years.

 

The effect of these proposals will be to place the Fund into “in–year” deficits for 2011 and 2012. If funding for the proposed initiatives was to continue on this basis in the medium term, then the accumulated surplus would very quickly be exhausted.

 

The primary Health Care Strategy when presented will include proposals for the sustainability of funding.

 
 
 
 
 

European Convention on Human Rights

 

Article 16 of the Human Rights (Jersey) Law 2000 requires the Minister in charge of a Projet de Loi to make a statement about the compatibility of the provisions of the Projet with the Convention rights (as defined by Article 1 of the Law). On 20 August 2010 the Minister for Social Security  made the following statement before the Second Reading of this Projet in the States Assembly –

 

In the view of the Minister for Social Security the provisions of the Health Insurance Fund (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Jersey) Law 201- are compatible with the Convention Rights.

 

Appendix 1   -  Primary care services currently funded by Health and Social Services

 

 
Primary Care Services

 
Directorate

 
H&SS

fte

 
Budget

2011

 
Comments

 
GP Out of Hours Service

 
Medical Services

 
2.30

 
80,000

 
GP Out of Hours Service

Smoking Cessation

Public Health

5.00

420,000

Nursing costs, drugs and other

non-pay costs

Childhood Immunisations

Public

Health

4.93

480,000

 

Diabetic supplies and subsidised products

Medical Services

 

301,000

Includes diabetic testing strips, dietary, oxygen and continence products

FNHC District Nursing

Third Sector

 

1,840,000

Family Nursing and Home Care

FNHC Child and Family

Third Sector

 

1,100,000

FNHC Home Care

Third Sector

 

1,920,000

 
Clinics run by Public Health

 
Public Health

 
5.69

 
290,000

 
Sexual health advisors, nurses, support staff, drugs & non-pay costs

Brook Advisory Services

Third Sector

 

260,000

Grant paid to Brook Advisory

Ante-natal Services

Surgical Services

4.80

280,000

Nursing staff and medical

supplies costs

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Explanatory Note

The principal purpose of this draft Law is to pave the way for the introduction of new arrangements for the delivery and regulation of primary care.

Article 1 directs that £6.131 million shall be transferred from the Health Insurance Fund to the consolidated fund. The money transferred is to be used to fund primary care services in 2011.

Article 2 enables the States to make a further transfer from the Health Insurance Fund to the consolidated fund, to fund primary care services in 2012. Only the Minister for Social Security may lodge a proposition proposing the transfer.

Article 3 widens the powers of the Minister for Social Security to pay expenses out of the Health Insurance Fund. The expenses authorized are the one-off costs associated with developing and setting up the primary care governance systems for performance monitoring that were described in the Report that accompanied the draft Health Insurance (Medical Benefit) (Amendment No. 3) (Jersey) Regulations 201- (P.36/2010, adopted by the States on 12th May 2010).

Article 4 provides for the citation of the draft Law. If adopted, the Law would commence on the day it is registered in the Royal Court.

 
 
 

 

Health Insurance Fund (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Jersey) Law 201-

Arrangement

Article

 
 

 

Health Insurance Fund (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Jersey) Law 201-

A LAW to withdraw money from the Health Insurance Fund for 2011, to enable the withdrawal of money from that Fund for 2012 and to authorize the withdrawal of certain expenses from that Fund

Adopted by the States [date to be inserted]

Sanctioned by Order of Her Majesty in Council [date to be inserted]

Registered by the Royal Court [date to be inserted]

THE STATES, subject to the sanction of Her Most Excellent Majesty in Council, have adopted the following Law 

1 Withdrawal of money from Health Insurance Fund for 2011

(1) Notwithstanding Article 21(1) of the Health Insurance (Jersey) Law 1967, there shall be withdrawn from the Health Insurance Fund and credited to the consolidated fund the sum of £6,131,100, for the purpose of funding primary care services in 2011.

(2) Money credited to the consolidated fund pursuant to paragraph (1) is, for the purposes of the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005, to be treated as income of, and paid into the consolidated fund by, the Health and Social Services Department.

 
2 Authority to withdraw money from Health Insurance Fund for 2012

(1) Notwithstanding Article 21(1) of the Health Insurance (Jersey) Law 1967, there shall be withdrawn from the Health Insurance Fund and credited to the consolidated fund, for the purpose of funding primary care services in 2012, such sum (if any) as is specified in a proposition lodged by the Minister for Social Security and adopted by the States.

(2) Money credited to the consolidated fund pursuant to paragraph (1) is, for the purposes of the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005, to be treated as income of, and paid into the consolidated fund by, the Health and Social Services Department.

 
3 Authority for Minister to withdraw expenses from Health Insurance Fund

Notwithstanding Article 21(1) of the Health Insurance (Jersey) Law 1967, the Minister for Social Security may pay out of the Health Insurance Fund expenses incurred in developing an infrastructure (to include a system for data-gathering) and establishing arrangements for 

(a) primary care governance; and

(b) the assessment and monitoring of primary care standards.

 
4 Citation

This Law may be cited as the Health Insurance Fund (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Jersey) Law 201-.

 

 

Back to top
rating button