Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Public Employees Contributory Retirement Scheme (PECRS) and Teachers' Superannuation Fund (JTSF): Commutation of Deferred Benefits: Amendments of Various Legislation

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 27 February 2015:

Ministerial decision reference    MD-C-2015-0028

Decision summary title    Commutation of Deferred Benefits Amendment

Decision summary author

Project Director - Pensions

Is the decision summary public or exempt? 

Public

Report title    Public Employees Contributory Retirement Scheme (PECRS) and Jersey Teachers’ Superannuation Fund (JTSF) - Commutation of Deferred Benefits Amendment

Report author or name of

person giving report

Project Director - Pensions

Is the report public or exempt?

Public

Decision and reason for the decision

The Chief Minister decided to amend the relevant PECRS and JTSF legislation in line with that of the Income Tax legislation and allow deferred pensioners the choice to commute their benefits into a lump sum not exceeding £18,000.

  1. The Committee of Management of the PECRS has requested an amendment to Regulation 16A of the Public Employees (Contributory Retirement Scheme) (New Members) Regulations 1989 and the Public Employees (Contributory Retirement Scheme) (Existing Members) Regulations 1989. This amendment should also be applied to Article 34A of the Teachers’ Superannuation (New Members) (Jersey) Order 2007 and Article 59B of the Teachers’ Superannuation (Existing Members) (Jersey) Order 2007.
  2. The amendment will allow members who have deferred benefits to choose to commute those benefits into a lump sum not exceeding £18,000. This is an increase from the current limit of £5,000.
  3. The amendments are requested in order that the PECRS Regulations and JTSF Orders match the changes that have been made through the Income Tax (Amendment No. 44) (Jersey) Law 2014 under Article 131 (13), which came into force on 1st January 2015.

Resource implications

There are no financial or staffing implications.

Action required

The Project Director – Pensions is requested to instruct the Law Draftsman accordingly.

Signature

 

 

 

Position

Senator I J Gorst

Chief Minister

 

 

 

 

Date signed

 

Effective date of the decision

 

Public Employees Contributory Retirement Scheme (PECRS) and Teachers' Superannuation Fund (JTSF): Commutation of Deferred Benefits: Amendments of Various Legislation

 

STATES EMPLOYMENT BOARD

 

TREASURY AND RESOURCES DEPARTMENT  

 

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT SCHEME (PECRS) & JERSEY TEACHERS SUPERANNUATION FUN (JTSF)

 

COMMUTATION OF DEFERRED BENEFITS AMENDMENT

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

  1. The Committee of Management has requested an amendment to Regulation 16A of the Public Employees (Contributory Retirement Scheme) (New Members) Regulations 1989 and the Public Employees (Contributory Retirement Scheme) (Existing Members) Regulations 1989. This amendment should may also be applied to Article 34A of the Teachers’ Superannuation (New Members) (Jersey) Order 2007 and Article 59B of the Teachers’ Superannuation (Existing Members) (Jersey) Order 2007

 

  1. The amendment will allow members who have deferred benefits to choose to commute those benefits into a lump sum not exceeding £18,000.  This is an increase from the current limit of £5,000.

 

  1. The amendments are requested in order that the PECRS Regulations and JTSF Orders match the changes that have been made through the Income Tax (Amendment No. 44) (Jersey) Law 2014 under Article 131(13), which came into force on 1st January 2015.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

  1. In 2011, the PECRS Regulations and JTSF Orders were amended to allow a person, who had deferred benefits in PECRS or JTSF to be able to commute those benefits into a lump sum as long as the transfer value was no greater than £5,000. 

 

  1. An advantage of allowing commutation of deferred benefits is that it allows for the removal of relatively small pensions from the Schemes and alleviates the burden on the Pension Unit of having to administer those small pensions.

 

  1. From 2011 the tax legislation relating to commutation of trivial pension was dealt with under the Income Tax (superannuation Funds) Order 2008.  The Order allowed schemes to implement the commutation of small deferred benefits, if the member elected to do so. This provision is now dealt with entirely under the Income Tax Law 1961, under article 131(13).

 

 

AMENDMENT TO SCHEME LEGISLATION

 

  1. In considering the proposed amendment to the legislation, it is important to note that the tax rules contain maximum limits but it is not an automatic requirement that schemes have limits that equal those in the tax legislation. Individual scheme limits can be less than the tax legislation allows for or may not allow the commutation at all.

 

  1. Currently, a transfer value of £18,000, taking into consideration such factors as gender, age and the Scheme legislation applicable to the member, equates to an annual pension of circa £1,800 per annum, i.e. some £150 a month
  2. In addition, members at their deferred pension age would be eligible to commute up to 25% of their pension for a lump sum.  25% of £1,800 is £450 which, when using the current conversion figures of £13.50 for every £1 given up, creates a lump sum of £6,075.  This would leave a remaining annual pension of £1,350, or £112.50 a month.

 

  1. The above pension will also increase annually in line with the Jersey Retail Prices index (subject to the Scheme’s ability to pay) and would supplement other income the member may have in retirement.

 

  1. Allowing this amendment to the legislation could mean less of an administrative burden on both Schemes. Nonetheless, allowing individuals more choice regarding deferred pension benefits may result in additional strain on the income support system during retirement. However, the Board may find it difficult to justify a refusal on these grounds.

 

  1. SEB are asked to consider agreeing the Committee of Management’s request to increase the maximum value of benefits that can be commuted to a lump sum to bring it into line with tax legislation. The revised maximum lump sum of £18,000 would be applied to both PECRS and JTSF for consistency.

 

FURTHER ACTION

 

  1. The Board is asked to agree to the CoM’s request to bring PECRS and JTSF legislation in line with that of the Income Tax legislation and so allow deferred pensioners the choice to commute their benefits into a lump sum not exceeding £18,000.

 

 

MB/TRY/PENS

13.01.15

 

Back to top
rating button