Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Crime (Prejudice and Public Disorder) Law Consultation

Produced by the Strategic Policy, Performance and Population (Strategic Policy, Planning and Performance)
Authored by Nathan Fox, Strategic Policy, Planning and Performance and published on 26 Apr 2021
Prepared internally, no external cost

Summary

The consultation initially ran from Monday 14th October to 9th December 2019. It was launched at the same time as the SoJP awareness campaign addressing hate crime in Jersey. It was hoped that the issue would be highlighted in the minds of the public and interesting enough to make comment upon.

At the end of November, only two submissions had been received. This raised concerns that the views of the public might not be fully represented, and the Minister approved an extension of the consultation to 10th January and an additional effort was made on social and other media to promote the consultation and seek submissions.

In fact, the last week of the planned consultation saw six additional responses received, and only four arrived during the extension (two of which were sent late in error).

The consultation paper contained 17 questions, with an option for binary yes/no answers and an opportunity to make a narrative response. Comments could be submitted by means of a dedicated email address or by post. There was no accompanying survey as it was anticipated that the narrative comments would be more informative than a quantitative count of yes/no answers. 

The consultation was not issued in translated version, despite arguably being of special interest to members of the public not fluent in English. This was considered, but there were concerns about delay and cost and it would not have been realistically possible to precisely translate the Law in any case.


Back to top
rating button