Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

  • Choose the service you want to log in to:

  • gov.je

    Update your notification preferences

  • one.gov.je

    Access government services

  • CAESAR

    Clear goods through customs or claim relief

  • Talentlink

    View or update your States of Jersey job application

Community Provisions (Restrictive Measures - Iran) (Amendment No. 3) (Jersey) Order 2013

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 25 March 2013:

Decision Reference: MD-C-2013-0026 

Decision Summary Title :

Community Provisions (Restrictive Measures – Iran) (Amendment No 3) (Jersey) Order 2013

Date of Decision Summary:

25th March 2013

Decision Summary Author:

 

International Relations

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Community Provisions (Restrictive Measures – Iran) (Amendment No 3) (Jersey) Order 2013

Date of Written Report:

25th March 2013

Written Report Author:

Law Draftsman

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject: Community Provisions (Restrictive Measures – Iran) (Amendment No 3) (Jersey) Order 2013

Decision(s):  The Chief Minister in pursuance of Article 2 of the European Communities Legislation (Implementation) (Jersey) Law 1966 and having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran, and having taken notice of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 206/2013 of 11 March 2013, decided to make the Community Provisions (Restrictive Measures – Iran) (Amendment No 3) (Jersey) Order 2013.

Reason(s) for Decision: Regulation 359/2011 listed persons who had been designated as being responsible for serious human rights violations in Iran, and persons, entities or bodies associated with them.  The Community Provisions (Restrictive Measures – Iran) (Amendment No 3) (Jersey) Order 2013 adds a further nine individuals and one entity who would be subject to an asset freeze.

Resource Implications:  There are no manpower or financial implications arising from this Order

Action required: The Chief Minister’s Department to:-

 

  • Inform the Greffier of the States and the Publications Editor that the Order has been made and should be forwarded to the States Assembly;
  • Deliver the signed and sealed Order to the Publications Editor.

Signature:

 

 

Position:

 

 

Chief Minister

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

Back to top
rating button